Re: [NTISP] Post.Office and program delivery

Dale E. Reed Jr. ( (no email) )
Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:30:15 -0700

Will LaSala wrote:
> > > Nope, you're wrong. See previous post.
> >
> > I'm not wrong. <SNIP>
> Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed...
> hehe,
> But Dale you are absolutely right the command utilities are good for scripts
> but not for any real programs.
> I've used them in perl but I'd rather use TCP sockets for most of the stuff
> I need (other than management).
> However to Paul's defense, he does have a very strong product and when ever
> I've needed help they have always been right on top of it.

I have a Post.Office license sitting here that I play with. I'd love
to use it, I just need Software.Com to work with us a little and get
some good APIs in. I always liked the product and we still have
some support for it today. I just wish we could finish the full
support for it, rather than a one-time sync only. :(

I spent hours with Robert and Software.Com when 3.0 came out to
resolve problems (incompatabilities) in the 2.x -> 3.x mail handling
differences. I guess what I am trying to say is that I'm not trying
to say anything bad about them or the product as we do wish to
continue supporting it.


Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT__________________________________________IEA Software, Inc.

For more information about this list (including removal) go to: