The only problem is really netscape 2 users that cant support httpd 1.1??
>But if you don't then how can you get sitename.com to work without the www in
>front of it? It is better to have seperate ip's.
>
>Danny wrote:
>
>> U dont understand you don't need a seperate IP address for a new website
>> thingy so why do you bother binding all them additional IP address to
the NT.
>>
>> For more information about this list, including removal,
>> see this url: http://www.iea-software.com/maillist.html
>
>
>For more information about this list, including removal,
>see this url: http://www.iea-software.com/maillist.html
>
>
For more information about this list, including removal,
see this url: http://www.iea-software.com/maillist.html