- Danny
-----Original Message-----
From: Ethan <ethan@fdt.net>
To: Preston Korn <preston@jaycreek.com>
Cc: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: Compaq vs. PM3
>I have several Portmaster 3's in remote areas and they work great. They
>are easy to configure and run for long periods of time without
>maintenance. The only drawback is that Lucent has been very slow in
>releasing the final version of V.90. They just can't seem to get it right.
>
>
>
>On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Preston Korn wrote:
>
>> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:04:29 -0700
>> From: Preston Korn <preston@jaycreek.com>
>> Reply-To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>> Subject: Compaq vs. PM3
>>
>> Does anyone have any input on the compaq access servers vs the Lucent
PM3?
>> Which is better? Are they just as good? Which do you recommend?
>>
>> Preston
>>
>
>
>
>
>******************************************************
>Ethan Meiselman "ethan@fdt.net"
>NT Network Administrator
>Florida Digital Turnpike
>Public PGP Key http://gnv.fdt.net/~ethan/keys/pgp.txt
>******************************************************
>