RE: Compaq vs. PM3

greg Lowthian ( (no email) )
Mon, 24 Aug 1998 18:21:39 -0700

I have three PM3's also in remote locations and 4 Ascend Max 4xxx in
remote locations and the only problem I have, is I know next to nothing
about them because they never need touching they just run. The only
consideration I place on new ones is which I can get cheaper PM3 or Max.

>
>
> I have several Portmaster 3's in remote areas and they work great. They
> are easy to configure and run for long periods of time without
> maintenance. The only drawback is that Lucent has been very slow in
> releasing the final version of V.90. They just can't seem to get it right.
>
>
>
> On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Preston Korn wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:04:29 -0700
> > From: Preston Korn <preston@jaycreek.com>
> > Reply-To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> > To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> > Subject: Compaq vs. PM3
> >
> > Does anyone have any input on the compaq access servers vs the
> Lucent PM3?
> > Which is better? Are they just as good? Which do you recommend?
> >
> > Preston
> >
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************
> Ethan Meiselman "ethan@fdt.net"
> NT Network Administrator
> Florida Digital Turnpike
> Public PGP Key http://gnv.fdt.net/~ethan/keys/pgp.txt
> ******************************************************
>