Re: IRC question

Kevin Ingram ( (no email) )
Sat, 9 May 1998 18:39:34 -0500

I have no doubt one of us has no concept of what "no-morals" means, we just
differ on who.

Kevin Ingram
Access Online Staff support@cameron.net
http://www.cameron.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory W. Bondy <gbondy@MAELSTROM.NET>
To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
Date: Saturday, May 09, 1998 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: IRC question

>>From: "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
>>To: <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
>>Subject: Re: IRC question
>>Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 09:39:16 -0500
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
>>Reply-To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>My reply is BASED on informative content, I have worked with age groups
from
>>preteen to adult who have been exposed to the no-morals anything-goes
>>"uncensored" ideals and have seen the resulting suffering and loss.
>
>Your experience is irrelevant to the subject at hand. "uncensored" does
>not equal "no-morals". Perhaps some time with a dictionary would do you
>some good? http://www.m-w.com
>
>>My
>>comment was quite illustrative, too bad you let it skip over you.
>>
>
>I let nothing skip, your one-line "comment" was not illustrative of
>anything other than your ignorance and penchant for moronic monosyllabic
>replies to social issues. If you would like to send a pornographic
>subscription to a child, i'm sure the Federal Bureau of Investigation would
>love to hear about it. Again, your intellect wounds me.
>
>>Don't sound so offended by my comments after slinging yours around so
freely
>>to begin with.
>
>I'm not offended at all. Your kneejerk useless commentary is amusing,
>nothing more. You said one ignorant line designed to be uselessly
>inflammatory, whereas I provided useful information to the group and the
>original poster. Considering the fact that I actually helped the man, I am
>well within my right to comment on his practices, especially considering
>how repugnant they are.
>
>>
>>Still standing for the truth.
>>Kevin Ingram
>
>"truth"? What the heck are you talking about? `Censorship is "good"`?
>This is a "truth"? Okay, stand on your "truth". *shrug*
>
>If you wish to continue this line of conversation, feel free to contact me
>directly. Then again, you'd better make sure your favorite censor doesn't
>mind first; I'm liable to use some "adult" content, like "freedom of
>speech" or "the first amendment".
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Gregory W. Bondy <gbondy@MAELSTROM.NET>
>>To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
>>Date: Saturday, May 09, 1998 9:10 AM
>>Subject: Re: IRC question
>>
>>
>>>You wound me with your intellectual prowess there, Kevin.
>>>
>>>The link I gave was a legitimate one, he will find the tools he needs to
>>>further censor the universe from his [adult] subscribers. Your reply
seems
>>>to needlessly display your ignorance without any informative content.
>>>
>>>However, if you'd like to pay for a Hustler subscription for my
[fictional]
>>>5 year old, let me know and i'll get you my snail mail address. ;)
>>>
>>>G
>>>
>>>At 06:28 AM 5/9/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>I'll be sure to send your 5 year old a sub to Hustler.
>>>>
>>>>Kevin Ingram
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Gregory W. Bondy <gbondy@MAELSTROM.NET>
>>>>To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
>>>>Date: Friday, May 08, 1998 11:35 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: IRC question
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Just for the record, I find your whole overriding "clean" censorship
>>policy
>>>>>fundamentally revolting and distasteful.
>>>>>
>>>>>However, if you're interested in an ircd-like program with censorship
>>>>>ability, check out "Kitten"
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.jmjones.com/kitten/
>>>>>
>>>>>It's what _all_ the good fascist ISP's use.
>>>>>
>>>>>At 11:47 AM 5/9/98 +0800, you wrote:
>>>>>>Hello.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>We would like to limit the IRC servers and channels that our users
could
>>>>>>access.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What I plan is to run our own IRC server and have it link to other IRC
>>>>>>servers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Questions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1. Is it possible to specify which channels on the remote IRC server I
>>>>would
>>>>>>like my users to have access to ?
>>>>>>2. How ?
>>>>>>3. Does ircd, which runs on Unix, have this capability ?
>>>>>>4. If yes, what version ?
>>>>>>5. If not, what Windows NT IRC server has this capability ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hope someone could help me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Danny Sinang
>>>>>>President - Uplink Technologies, Inc.
>>>>>>( Provider of "Clean" Internet Access )
>>>>>>www.uplink.com.ph
>>>>>>danny@uplink.com.ph
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>
>
>Gregory W. Bondy
>Systems Administrator
>MaelstromNet, a service of DarkWell Communications
>postmaster@maelstrom.net, gbondy@maelstrom.net
>314-353-2352
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>