Thanks for the help..
From: David Kerr <email@example.com>
To: 'firstname.lastname@example.org' <email@example.com>
Date: Friday, May 29, 1998 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: User authentication
>here's the radius file i use for assiging static ip's and subnets.
>I have a max 4k and its seems to work ok
>Dns gets picked up from the max if the client sets win95 up to use server
assigned name server.
>User Service Framed User
>Framed Protocol MPP
>Framed Address 126.96.36.199
>Framed Netmask 255.255.255.252 < this sets the subnet
>Ascend Metric 2
>Ascend Idle limit 0
>On Friday, May 29, 1998 3:13 PM, Richard Sensale wrote:
>> Yes. We only have the one class C, The ascend is set to handle it's won
>> routing. I was just wondering if the MAX needed a different attribute
>> the regular Framed Address attrib. Like I said there is an ASCEND PPP
>> Address attrib in the radius section and I was wondering if that is the
>> I needed.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Date: Friday, May 29, 1998 8:06 AM
>> Subject: Re: User authentication
>> >Richard Sensale wrote:
>> >> No , I mean assigning a static IP to users.. Jurt said all i had to
>> >> put in a FramedAddress radius attribute and use the IP we wanted to
>> >> as the value. but when we do that, the user can't get DNS. And is
>> >> unpingable from our end. I have tried it with four test accounts with
>> >> different setups. I'm just wondering if the MAX needs a different
>> >> like that ASCEND PPP Address attribute instead of the framed address
>> >> attribute.
>> >Is the IP ADdress you are assigning in the same subnet as the MAX
>> >This sounds like a routing/subnet issue to me.
>> >Dale E. Reed Jr. (email@example.com)
>> > IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
>> > Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com