Ascend-PPP should not be needed for anything. We've got 3 Maxes (4004,
4048, 4002) and have people dialing into all of them with dynamic IPs as
well as static without any problems. DNS IP addresses are dynamically
assigned directly by the Maxes. Here are sample radius settings:
Standard PPP connection:
User-Service: Framed-User
Framed-Protocol: PPP
Ascend-Maximum-Time: 43200 (optional)
Ascend-Idle-Limit: 1200 (optional)
Static IP PPP connection:
User-Service: Framed-User
Framed-Protocol: PPP
Framed-Address: 199.44.20.123
Framed-Netmask: 255.255.255.255
Ascend-Maximum-Time: 43200 (optional)
Ascend-Idle-Limit: 1200 (optional)
Make sure that your routing is set correctly in the Max:
Ethernet / Static Rtes
Dynamic DNS assignment:
Ethernet / Mod Config / DNS
Josh Hillman
hillman@talstar.com
> From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <daler@iea-software.com>
> >Is the IP ADdress you are assigning in the same subnet as the MAX
itself?
> >This sounds like a routing/subnet issue to me.
>
> >Richard Sensale wrote:
> >> No , I mean assigning a static IP to users.. Jurt said all i had to
do
> was
> >> put in a FramedAddress radius attribute and use the IP we wanted to
> assign
> >> as the value. but when we do that, the user can't get DNS. And is
> >> unpingable from our end. I have tried it with four test accounts with
> >> different setups. I'm just wondering if the MAX needs a different
> attribute
> >> like that ASCEND PPP Address attribute instead of the framed address
> >> attribute.