Re: Memory Suggestions

Mitchell B. Wagers ( (no email) )
Thu, 22 Jan 1998 13:03:28 -0800

If I wanted to criticise to a public list, I would do so. I don't feel
that necessary, I've gotten involved with miscellaneous "stuff" on this
mailing list just like everyone else, but it's not the place for it.

At 12:28 PM 1/21/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Please -- enlighten me. Where do you feel that I got it wrong? (And you
>can post it to the RADIUSNT list -- I can take public criticism).
>At 08:31 AM 1/21/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>I believe somewhere some misconceptions have arrived. For serious, to the
>>point, answers, email me at
>>At 09:57 AM 1/21/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>>Repeat after me.... NT LOVES RAM. NT LOVES RAM. NT LOVES RAM.
>>>I'd suggest you not futz with it, and just go to 256 MB. A 64 MB SIMM is
>>>about $120 if you know where to look.
>>>My recommendation is ALWAYS, however, to avoid buying obsolete or soon to
>>>be obsolete systems. I don't buy Pentiums (I buy P-II's). I don't buy
>>>SIMMS unless I have to -- I buy DIMMS. (And if I *have* to buy SIMMS,
>>>they are EDO and at least 32 MB per SIMM -- I've got no use for a 16 MB
>>>chip these days).
>>>If you're going to buy RAM, and it is in the budget, upgrade the WHOLE
>>>MACHINE and just drop the old hard drive into it.... A Pentium-II/233
>>>motherboard and CPU can be had for as little as $480 (and further price
>>>cuts are expected this month!). A P-II board takes DIMMs, so you'd need 4
>>>64MB chips totalling about $500. The rest of your hardware SHOULD remain
>>>compatible... You may need a new CASE for a P-II as the power connectors
>>>are not compatible, either. $50.
>>>So, for barely $1000, your SQL machine can be top notch, doubled in
>>>processing power, doubled in RAM, and easily doubled in performance.
>>>If that's out of the question, then you're right -- the more RAM in NT the
>>>better. Also, with NT, RAID or stripe sets over multiple smaller drives
>>>can up your performance. (You're not using IDE for this mission-critical
>>>machine, are you?). Get LOTS of small, 1 GB SCSI drives, and make them a
>>>single stripe set, or preferrably a RAID-5 set. The more drives in the
>>>set, the more the disk access is "distributed" and the faster any disk
>>>access will be when it DOES need to swap. SCSI hardware RAID volumes are
>>>an ORDER of MAGNITUDE faster than a single IDE drive. Even IDE stripe
>>>sets can help over a single IDE, though you'll want to MIRROR them for
>>>redundancy's sake.
>>>At 08:43 AM 1/21/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>>>Anybody have any suggestions on memory for a computer, other than as
>>>>much as you can get?
>>>>We have 8000+ dialups who are smacking the radius server very hard
>>>>(average of 13 Transactions/sec with peaks in the 40's). This is all
>>>>running on a Compaq Proliant 800 with 64 meg of ram in it, has SQL
>>>>server 6.5 service pack 4, ODBCv 3.0, and radiusNT v2.2. Memory is
>>>>running at around 110 meg in use, so obviously we need to go upto at
>>>>least 120meg; what would the suggestion be for 12000+ customers, we are
>>>>having some slow logins right now, and the CPU is up pretty high also
>>>>(I'm assuming most of this is because of swapping memory out to drive),
>>>>I'm assuming more memory would help both of these.
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> RadiusNT Mailing List
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> RadiusNT Mailing List
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> RadiusNT Mailing List