My apologies for any faults of mine.
Mitch
At 08:36 PM 3/25/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I am very familiar with the Tolly group. The company I work for has used
them
>before. I've also seen and heard the gospel from the disciples of them.
Don't
>get me wrong, I'm not knocking their capabilities. The problem is when folks
>take what they say as the gospel and don't factor other tings into the
equation
>beyond simple technical comparison tests. Statistics can be made to look any
>way you want, depending upon who's doing the test. Having been burned with
>this before I tend to be more gun shy and less fanatical nowdays.
>
>Jeff
>
>
>-> Um no, the Tolly Group is a world-wide company that provides factual test
>-> data. One of the very few companies that does actual
controlled-environment
>-> testing. Before you make claims, read up on it. If you'd been following
the
>-> posts, you would have known that I have nothing to do with them, and I
don't
>-> appreciate being referred as that. If you also notice, I never said x2 was
>-> better than K56Flex or vice versa, I said they both perform equally
well in
>-> most cases. However you wish to twist things, feel free, but those of us
>-> that know and have been down that road don't care.
>->
>-> At 12:14 PM 3/25/98 -0500, you wrote:
>-> >-> If this wasn't performed by the TOLLY Group, it's not valid anyway!
>->
>-> At 02:07 PM 3/24/98 -0500, you wrote:
>-> >-> >On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, rkm wrote:
>-> >-> >
>-> >
>-> >A potential disciple of Kevin's ? I don't think our users care
whether >a
>-> report was performed by the Tolly group or anyone for that matter. >Let's
>-> keep things is perspective here.
>-> >
>-> >Jeff Binkley
>-> >ASA Network Computing
>-> >
>-> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>-> > NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>-> >
>-> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>