Thanks Will
----
From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <daler@iea.com>
To: emerald@emerald.iea.com
Date: Saturday, June 21, 1997 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: Post.Office - Emerald 2.2.2
>Tom Bilan wrote:
>>
>> It's supposed to work with 2.2
>>
>> I'm waiting for the release too.
>>
>> Dale? *nudge*
>
>Ok. Robert Boyle and myself got to the bottom of this Post.Office 3.x
>issue today. It seems that Software.Com mis-documented thier "not much
>used" Email forms and changed it quite a bit in 3.x. Of the more
>annoying
>things is that many of the "Optional" labeled form fields are actually
>not
>optional, and that is what is causing the problem. We should have a
>working
>version of Emerald 2.2.x that will correctly create the accounts on
>Post.Office.
>
>I am not putting the blame on Software.Com (since we do not send all
>the form fields which would have prevented the problem anyways) just
>that because of changes in their E-Mail form behavior, it took us a
>little longer to finally resolve the Post.Office 3.x problems. I'll try
>to get Emerald 2.2.25 or so to those who have inquired about it for
>Post.Office 3.x over the weekend so you can install it next week.
>
>--
>Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea.com)
>_________________________________________________________________
> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.emerald.iea.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Emerald Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>