We have been using IPSwitch iMail for some time now and have hade VERY FEW
problems. With 600 eMail address and 3 small lists, it is running under NT
on a p75 64MB ram, and sharring CPU with Netscape Fasttrack & DNS with
average CPU Time about 30%.
Perviously we ran Netscape mail 2.01 and had a terrible time. iMail solved
most of our problems.
Version 4 is to have imap4 and many other valuable options including
anti-spam capabilities. We will be upgrading our v3.04 to 4 as soon as it
has been out for a few months.
They claim that with a dual ppro 200 and a ton of ram that it will will
handle 240,000 messages a day, so for the average isp and a semi decent
system, it should do great.
I am very happy with iMail. The only improvment I have asked for is a
better way to find & maintain the user base & sql (Emerald) integration.
JOhn :}
John C. Lange, Sr. PALACE dot NET, INC.
microjl@palacenet.net MICRO-TECH Computers!
608.742.1601 & 6980 2800 New Pinery Road, Suite 10
http://www.palacenet.net/ Portage, WI 53901
http://www.microt.com/
--- __o
--- _-\<,_ FASTEST SERVICE IN TOWN
--- (_)/ (_)
----------
> From: Bobby Tompkins <btompk@scrtc.blue.net>
> To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> Subject: IPswitch
> Date: Wednesday, May 21, 1997 10:33 AM
>
> We are currently considering the IPswitch email system to run on NT 4.0.
>
> Does anyone have any comments or experiences they could take time to
share
> about this product?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Bobby Tompkins
> QWIS, Inc.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>