Thank you,
Greg White
Direct NET Communications
----------
> From: John Lange <radadmin@palacenet.net>
> To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> Subject: Re: IPswitch
> Date: Wednesday, May 21, 1997 9:11 AM
>
> HI
>
> We have been using IPSwitch iMail for some time now and have hade VERY
FEW
> problems. With 600 eMail address and 3 small lists, it is running under
NT
> on a p75 64MB ram, and sharring CPU with Netscape Fasttrack & DNS with
> average CPU Time about 30%.
>
> Perviously we ran Netscape mail 2.01 and had a terrible time. iMail
solved
> most of our problems.
>
> Version 4 is to have imap4 and many other valuable options including
> anti-spam capabilities. We will be upgrading our v3.04 to 4 as soon as
it
> has been out for a few months.
>
> They claim that with a dual ppro 200 and a ton of ram that it will will
> handle 240,000 messages a day, so for the average isp and a semi decent
> system, it should do great.
>
> I am very happy with iMail. The only improvment I have asked for is a
> better way to find & maintain the user base & sql (Emerald) integration.
>
> JOhn :}
>
> John C. Lange, Sr. PALACE dot NET, INC.
> microjl@palacenet.net MICRO-TECH Computers!
> 608.742.1601 & 6980 2800 New Pinery Road, Suite 10
> http://www.palacenet.net/ Portage, WI 53901
> http://www.microt.com/
>
> --- __o
> --- _-\<,_ FASTEST SERVICE IN TOWN
> --- (_)/ (_)
>
> ----------
> > From: Bobby Tompkins <btompk@scrtc.blue.net>
> > To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> > Subject: IPswitch
> > Date: Wednesday, May 21, 1997 10:33 AM
> >
> > We are currently considering the IPswitch email system to run on NT
4.0.
>
> >
> > Does anyone have any comments or experiences they could take time to
> share
> > about this product?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Bobby Tompkins
> > QWIS, Inc.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com