This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was
not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura-
Most likely there is a network problem that prevented delivery, but
it is also possible that the computer is turned off, or does not
have a mail system running right now.
The queue containing messages destined for gl.i-server.net
was expired by the Postmaster of mail.i-server.net.
The following recipients did not receive your message:
Please reply to Postmaster@mail.i-server.net
if you feel this message to be in error.
--===========================_ _= 3670043(125)
Received: from walnut.iea-software.com ([18.104.22.168])
by mail.i-server.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO205e
ID# 127-49346U1000L100S0) with ESMTP id AAA167
Sat, 12 Sep 1998 07:36:48 +0200
Received: from walnut.iea-software.com (walnut.iea-software.com [22.214.171.124]) by walnut.iea-software.com (NTMail 4.00.0020/NT6651.00.c89adb95) with ESMTP id za000505 for <firstname.lastname@example.org> Fri, 11 Sep 1998 22:18:17 +0100
Received: from [126.96.36.199] by walnut.iea-software.com (NTMail 4.00.0020/NT6651.00.c89adb95) with ESMTP id kgfaaaaa for <email@example.com> Fri, 11 Sep 1998 22:18:16 +0100
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 22:23:47 -0700
From: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Organization: IEA Software, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (WinNT; I)
To: Will LaSala <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Multi-link PPP (Shotgun) Radius Profile
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Will LaSala wrote:
> Hi all,
> we're having a small problem here.
> When we were running Radius NT 1.16 and tried our transcend modem (dual
> modem) the modems created a connection just fine.
> Now however we are running Radius NT 2.5 and we can't get any of our dual
> modems to work (like Shotgun, Transcend, Multi-Link Windows DUN)
> Is there a certain radius Profile that I should have for those type of
> We have Ascend TNT max's for the shotgun people and Livingston PM 2's for
> the transcends.
There should not be any differences, except for the normal
concurrency control, etc. What does RadiusNT show for a reject
reason on the second authentication? Do you have a Port-Limit that
would prevent the request at the NAS?
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (firstname.lastname@example.org)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com--===========================_ _= 3670043(125)--