Mail System Error - Returned Mail

Mail Administrato ( )
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:51:27 -0700

--===========================_ _= 9521459(4551)
Content-Type: text/plain

This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:

A message was not delivered because a loop was found in the Mail
eXchanger record database (the MX loop condition). The destination
host has an MX record that points to this host, but there is no
account for the designated recipient.

Here are a few possible solutions for clearing up this problem:

- add the domain name to your list of Local Mail Domains
if this mail server has complete authority over all
mail accounts within that domain

- return the mail since the address was invalid

- fix the MX records in the DNS for the host in question
and then resubmit the message

- add an account or alias for the recipient on this machine
and then resubmit the message

If this machine should be handling all mail for the destination
host, it should be added to the list of Local-Mail-Domains in
the "system" configuration.

Destination host:

The following recipients did not receive this message:


Please reply to
if you feel this message to be in error.

--===========================_ _= 9521459(4551)
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: from ([]) by
(Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c)
ID# 0-44404U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA355
for <> Fri, 9 Oct 1998 13:20:45 -0700
Received: from ( []) by (NTMail 4.00.0020/NT6651.00.c89adb95) with ESMTP id za002108 for <> Fri, 9 Oct 1998 13:46:09 -0700
Received: from [] by (NTMail 4.00.0020/NT6651.00.c89adb95) with ESMTP id qqebaaaa for <> Fri, 9 Oct 1998 13:46:06 -0700
Received: from milwpc (unverified []) by
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 2.1.6) with SMTP id <> for <>
Fri, 09 Oct 1998 15:52:41 -0500
Message-ID: <019901bdf3c6$84d70480$>
From: "webmaster" <>
To: <>
Subject: Re: IP Addr
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 15:50:58 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Script: \\FilterScript.mml

It is my understanding that only one IP address is needed since the second
isdn channel is bound to the first hence only one IP address. I record the
same thing and seems to be working fine.

Kenneth Jaeger
-----Original Message-----
From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <>
To: Thomas Massano <>
Cc: <>
Date: Friday, October 09, 1998 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: IP Addr

>Thomas Massano wrote:
>> I have Emerald 2.2.38 using an Ascend Max 4040.
>> When I look at the On-Line tab some of my ISDN users show an IP address
>>, but yet when they access one of my servers on my net, and i
>> their IP address, its a valid IP address for the port on the MAX that
>> are connected to. I understand the concept of un-numbered nets, but i
>> assumed it would use the Ascends Ethernet IP address with a different
>> number. Also its always the same users, that show
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>RadiusNT just reports what the Ascend sends it. There are some
>attributes for Ascend that could affect this, but I don't know.
>I use an un-numbered interface for my house and the Max4000 here
>reports the ethernet of the dialing in device for accounting.
>Dale E. Reed Jr. (
> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> Internet Solutions for Today |

--===========================_ _= 9521459(4551)--