Does anyone have the structures already in Access95?
At 11:25 PM 7/26/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Ted Olson wrote:
>> The good news is that all is running great again! I still have a question
>> mark about what actually happened to cause the problem in the first place,
>> but that may never be known. Would a reinstall of 1.16 have solved it?
>> Maybe, but by the time we reached that point it didn't make sense not to
>> move up to 2.5 (if that had not worked we would have backtracked).
>I don't know exactly why 2.5 works better with the ODBC 3.x and higher
>drivers, but its does. At an API layer, we are using the same calls.
>However, at an implementation level, it was completely re-written to
>be optimized for speed and flexibility.
>What I would be interested in Access is what the performance different
>(whether good or bad) is with RadiusNT 2.5, since it opens two
>to the database (one for accounting and one for authentication).
>Dale E. Reed Jr. (firstname.lastname@example.org)
> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com