Message 2: Re: Update Online user usage
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 3: *reload*
from "Greg Lowthian" <greg@isat.com>
Message 4: Re: Framed Route for Newbie
from "Kurt Schafer" <kahuna@cyberbeach.net>
Message 5: Re: Framed Route for Newbie
from "Michael A. Davis Jr." <mike.davis@dcsol.com>
Message 6: Re: Framed Route for Newbie
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 7: Newbie Question about ISDN connactions
from "David Moore" <moored@romtech.com.au>
Message 8: USR Upagrde problem
from "2Day Internet" <peter@2day.net.nz>
Message 9: RE: USR Upagrde problem
from Chris Thomas <ChrisT@mbcom.com.au>
Message 10: logging output
from Glen Harvy <root@aquarius.com.au>
Message 11: Re: logging output
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 12: Re: USR Upagrde problem
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 13: Re: Newbie Question about ISDN connactions
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 14: LANtronix LSR16
from Glen Harvy <root@aquarius.com.au>
Message 15: Re: USR Upagrde problem
from "2Day Internet" <peter@2day.net.nz>
Message 16: Re: USR Upagrde problem
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 1 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Framed Route for Newbie
From: "David Moore" <moored@romtech.com.au>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 22:49:16 +1000
I am trying to route 203.35.149.128 netmask 255.255.255.192 (62 hosts)
through USR Total Control using radius I have added to the users radius
profile the following command
Framed-Route 203.35.149.128/26 203.35.6.5 1
when I do an external traceroute the route disapears at 203.35.6.5 our TC
box is there another procedure or radius command I should also use, can
anybody help me with this one.
here are the results
Traceroute
Result for 203.35.149.129:
traceroute to 203.35.149.129 (203.35.149.129), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 dipt-gw (195.184.192.1) 4.284 ms 2.858 ms 2.781 ms
2 kiev-gw (195.184.192.214) 52.314 ms 64.036 ms 50.795 ms
3 UTC-FTICom-192k.ukrtel.net (195.5.5.169) 59.041 ms 56.198 ms 173.963
ms
4 Serial5-4.GW1.LND1.ALTER.NET (146.188.33.29) 153.881 ms 305.332 ms
303.099 ms
5 421.Atm1-0.CR2.LND1.Alter.net (146.188.3.221) 145.531 ms 211.165 ms
268.704 ms
6 412.Atm5-0.BR1.LND1.Alter.net (146.188.3.205) 426.658 ms 409.005 ms
313.129 ms
7 167.ATM4-0-0.CR1.SFO1.Alter.Net (137.39.70.241) 478.498 ms 380.581 ms
403.826 ms
8 110.ATM3-0-0.XR1.SFO4.ALTER.NET (146.188.145.6) 439.543 ms 371.796 ms
626.358 ms
9 191.ATM8-0-0.GW3.SFO1.ALTER.NET (146.188.145.229) 442.605 ms 569.706
ms 424.301 ms
10 att-sfo-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (157.130.193.62) 285.414 ms 302.328 ms
284.293 ms
11 199.37.127.250 (199.37.127.250) 340.967 ms 341.634 ms 371.977 ms
12 205.174.74.186 (205.174.74.186) 590.432 ms 643.715 ms 593.096 ms
13 Fddi0-0.pad-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.227) 677.871 ms
566.104 ms 564.462 ms
14 Fddi0-0.pad-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.227) 604.780 ms
572.491 ms 638.130 ms
15 Fddi1-0.chw-core1.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.6) 619.047 ms
589.609 ms 547.407 ms
16 Fddi0-0.chw1.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.36.227) 647.513 ms
203.35.6.254 (203.35.6.254) 712.997 ms 702.674 ms
17 203.35.6.5 (203.35.6.5) 589.908 ms 931.992 ms 738.737 ms
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * *
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 2 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Update Online user usage
From: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 13:48:20 -0700
Michael Whisenant wrote:
>
> Dale and/or members of this list...
>
> You posted this neat script a few weeks back. Now I have question or two.
> 1. If I were to run this on a 15 minute interval and planned to kep said
> data for a period of two months, what impact for size would that have on my
> database assuming that I have 30-40 NAS?
Probably not much. I'd guess you could collect a years worth of data in only a
couple of megs space in your DB (assuming you don't have 30-40 locations
defined).
> 2. How much impact would this be to automate. I think I can manually add
> this to the scheduled tasks on my SQL server. How would I add this to run
> on all 30 NAS automatically? What impact on performance etc....
Its not ran on a NAS. Each NAS that you configure in the Emerald Admin has a
location field. The script groups them by location. You should refine
your locations for each NAS to get exactly like all the others. I typically
associate a location with a hunt group. The script will them tell you how
many lines of each hunt group are in use. It can easily be aumated by
running it in SQL Task Manager. I would make a stored procedure called
DoOnlineCount and put the insert statement into there. Then I would
just call the DoOnlineCount proc from the task manager.
We actually do a lot of data collection this way for statistical analysis.
We've written many extended procedures for SQL Server that do things like
gather SNMP information (similiar to what MRTG does), look at network
utilization, etc. Once you have the information in the database, its
trivial to report on.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 3 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: *reload*From: "Greg Lowthian" <greg@isat.com>Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 17:26:17 -0700
So did I do something wrong or did the *reload* stop working in2.5
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 4 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: Framed Route for NewbieFrom: "Kurt Schafer" <kahuna@cyberbeach.net>Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 04:52:11 -0400
It looks like you have set up the route properly but that the equipment atthe other end of the line doesn't know that it's supposed to be handling thesubnet range.
= Kurt
-----Original Message-----From: David Moore <moored@romtech.com.au>To: RadiusNT <RadiusNT@emerald.iea.com>Date: Saturday, July 04, 1998 3:12 PMSubject: Framed Route for Newbie
>I am trying to route 203.35.149.128 netmask 255.255.255.192 (62 hosts)>through USR Total Control using radius I have added to the users radius>profile the following command>>Framed-Route 203.35.149.128/26 203.35.6.5 1>>when I do an external traceroute the route disapears at 203.35.6.5 our TC>box is there another procedure or radius command I should also use, can>anybody help me with this one.>>here are the results>>Traceroute>>Result for 203.35.149.129:>>traceroute to 203.35.149.129 (203.35.149.129), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets>>>1 dipt-gw (195.184.192.1) 4.284 ms 2.858 ms 2.781 ms> 2 kiev-gw (195.184.192.214) 52.314 ms 64.036 ms 50.795 ms> 3 UTC-FTICom-192k.ukrtel.net (195.5.5.169) 59.041 ms 56.198 ms 173.963>ms> 4 Serial5-4.GW1.LND1.ALTER.NET (146.188.33.29) 153.881 ms 305.332 ms>303.099 ms> 5 421.Atm1-0.CR2.LND1.Alter.net (146.188.3.221) 145.531 ms 211.165 ms>268.704 ms> 6 412.Atm5-0.BR1.LND1.Alter.net (146.188.3.205) 426.658 ms 409.005 ms>313.129 ms> 7 167.ATM4-0-0.CR1.SFO1.Alter.Net (137.39.70.241) 478.498 ms 380.581 ms>403.826 ms> 8 110.ATM3-0-0.XR1.SFO4.ALTER.NET (146.188.145.6) 439.543 ms 371.796 ms>626.358 ms> 9 191.ATM8-0-0.GW3.SFO1.ALTER.NET (146.188.145.229) 442.605 ms 569.706>ms 424.301 ms>10 att-sfo-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (157.130.193.62) 285.414 ms 302.328 ms>284.293 ms>11 199.37.127.250 (199.37.127.250) 340.967 ms 341.634 ms 371.977 ms>12 205.174.74.186 (205.174.74.186) 590.432 ms 643.715 ms 593.096 ms>13 Fddi0-0.pad-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.227) 677.871 ms>566.104 ms 564.462 ms>14 Fddi0-0.pad-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.227) 604.780 ms>572.491 ms 638.130 ms>15 Fddi1-0.chw-core1.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.6) 619.047 ms>589.609 ms 547.407 ms>16 Fddi0-0.chw1.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.36.227) 647.513 ms>203.35.6.254 (203.35.6.254) 712.997 ms 702.674 ms>17 203.35.6.5 (203.35.6.5) 589.908 ms 931.992 ms 738.737 ms>18 * * *>19 * * *>20 * * *>21 * * *>22 * * *>23 * *>>>>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 5 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: Framed Route for NewbieFrom: "Michael A. Davis Jr." <mike.davis@dcsol.com>Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 10:03:38 -0400
On our TC we give the customer a static IP (Framed-Address 1.2.3.4), then weset the subnet to route to this address (Framed-Route 203.35.149.128/261.2.3.4 1) and all goes well.
Mike
-----Original Message-----From: David Moore <moored@romtech.com.au>To: RadiusNT <RadiusNT@emerald.iea.com>Date: Sunday, July 05, 1998 3:15 AMSubject: Framed Route for Newbie
>I am trying to route 203.35.149.128 netmask 255.255.255.192 (62 hosts)>through USR Total Control using radius I have added to the users radius>profile the following command>>Framed-Route 203.35.149.128/26 203.35.6.5 1>>when I do an external traceroute the route disapears at 203.35.6.5 our TC>box is there another procedure or radius command I should also use, can>anybody help me with this one.>>here are the results>>Traceroute>>Result for 203.35.149.129:>>traceroute to 203.35.149.129 (203.35.149.129), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets>>>1 dipt-gw (195.184.192.1) 4.284 ms 2.858 ms 2.781 ms> 2 kiev-gw (195.184.192.214) 52.314 ms 64.036 ms 50.795 ms> 3 UTC-FTICom-192k.ukrtel.net (195.5.5.169) 59.041 ms 56.198 ms 173.963>ms> 4 Serial5-4.GW1.LND1.ALTER.NET (146.188.33.29) 153.881 ms 305.332 ms>303.099 ms> 5 421.Atm1-0.CR2.LND1.Alter.net (146.188.3.221) 145.531 ms 211.165 ms>268.704 ms> 6 412.Atm5-0.BR1.LND1.Alter.net (146.188.3.205) 426.658 ms 409.005 ms>313.129 ms> 7 167.ATM4-0-0.CR1.SFO1.Alter.Net (137.39.70.241) 478.498 ms 380.581 ms>403.826 ms> 8 110.ATM3-0-0.XR1.SFO4.ALTER.NET (146.188.145.6) 439.543 ms 371.796 ms>626.358 ms> 9 191.ATM8-0-0.GW3.SFO1.ALTER.NET (146.188.145.229) 442.605 ms 569.706>ms 424.301 ms>10 att-sfo-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (157.130.193.62) 285.414 ms 302.328 ms>284.293 ms>11 199.37.127.250 (199.37.127.250) 340.967 ms 341.634 ms 371.977 ms>12 205.174.74.186 (205.174.74.186) 590.432 ms 643.715 ms 593.096 ms>13 Fddi0-0.pad-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.227) 677.871 ms>566.104 ms 564.462 ms>14 Fddi0-0.pad-core2.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.227) 604.780 ms>572.491 ms 638.130 ms>15 Fddi1-0.chw-core1.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.249.6) 619.047 ms>589.609 ms 547.407 ms>16 Fddi0-0.chw1.Sydney.telstra.net (139.130.36.227) 647.513 ms>203.35.6.254 (203.35.6.254) 712.997 ms 702.674 ms>17 203.35.6.5 (203.35.6.5) 589.908 ms 931.992 ms 738.737 ms>18 * * *>19 * * *>20 * * *>21 * * *>22 * * *>23 * *>>>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 6 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: Framed Route for NewbieFrom: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>Date: Sun, 05 Jul 1998 16:14:03 -0700
David Moore wrote:> > I am trying to route 203.35.149.128 netmask 255.255.255.192 (62 hosts)> through USR Total Control using radius I have added to the users radius> profile the following command> > Framed-Route 203.35.149.128/26 203.35.6.5 1> > when I do an external traceroute the route disapears at 203.35.6.5 our TC> box is there another procedure or radius command I should also use, can> anybody help me with this one.
You need to route that subnet to your TC on your border routers, but onthe TC itself, you route the subnet to the next hop, not the TC itself.
For example, we use un-numbered WAN interfaces on some ISDN stuff (NTRAS can't do this) and assign the lowest number of the subnet as the IPof the ISDN TA's ethernet. The RadiusNT entry looks like this:
user Password = "Blah" User-Service = Framed-User, Framed-Protocol = PPP, Framed-Address = 203.35.149.130, Framed-Route = "203.35.149.128/26 203.35.149.130 1"
When the user gets dialed in, the TC knows thier IP is 203.35.149.30.It also dynamically adds the route to the subnet via the above IP. Whenthe user hands up, its all gone. Remember, you'll get a loop between theTC and your border router when the connection isn't up.
PS, everyone needs to make sure they are posting to the @iea-software.comdomain and NOT the @emerald.iea.com domain. Starting next week we will besending an auto-responder to everyone who is sending to the @emerald.iea.comdomain, so update your address book now and save your the trouble later.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 7 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Newbie Question about ISDN connactionsFrom: "David Moore" <moored@romtech.com.au>Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 12:27:58 +1000
We are using USR TC, our modems are appearing in the on line list but how doI get ISDN calls to show up in the on Line list.
Regards David Mooremoored@romtech.com.au
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 8 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: USR Upagrde problemFrom: "2Day Internet" <peter@2day.net.nz>Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 15:05:24 +1200
I have just upgraded the firmware on our Netserver/8i from rev 3.2.5.3 torev 4.0.14 authentication with RadiusNT 2.1.5 no longer works!
If I create a local user account on NAS, it authenticates fine andaccounting records are created by Radius NT without problem.
But if I try to get RadiusNT (ODBC / MS SQL Server 6.5) to authenticate...
RadiusNT displays 'Malformed Packet' messages. Any ideas?
regards
Peter MottChief Enthusiast2Day Internet Limited.
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 9 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: RE: USR Upagrde problemFrom: Chris Thomas <ChrisT@mbcom.com.au>Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 12:33:10 +0800
Which 'malformed packet' message are you getting, that might have madeit easier for us to take a guess at the problem. We found that theNetserver Plus was sending a larger than normal session ID, and as aresult, the field wasn't large enough and the record was rejected. Thismay be your problem.
Chris ThomasWestnet Internet Services
> -----Original Message-----> From: 2Day Internet [mailto:peter@2day.net.nz]> Sent: Monday, 6 July 1998 11:05> To: radiusnt@iea-software.com> Subject: USR Upagrde problem> Importance: High> > > I have just upgraded the firmware on our Netserver/8i from > rev 3.2.5.3 to> rev 4.0.14 authentication with RadiusNT 2.1.5 no longer works!> > If I create a local user account on NAS, it authenticates fine and> accounting records are created by Radius NT without problem.> > But if I try to get RadiusNT (ODBC / MS SQL Server 6.5) to > authenticate...> > RadiusNT displays 'Malformed Packet' messages. Any ideas?> > regards> > Peter Mott> Chief Enthusiast> 2Day Internet Limited.> >
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 10 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: logging outputFrom: Glen Harvy <root@aquarius.com.au>Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 14:32:30 +1000
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a Lantronixs LSR16 to use RadiusNT. There areobviously problems however the screen scrolls when using "radius -x15" soit's impossible for me to read the error messages.
How do you obtain a text file log of the output?
Glen.--------------------------------------------------------------------AQUARIUS Communications for all your Internet<>Fidonet needs <>Full ISP services<>FrontDoor Commercial<>TransX Internet/FTSC Mailervoice(02)9977-3788<>fax(02)9977-3844<>bbs(02)9977-2855<>3:714/930http://www.aquarius.com.au <> mailto:sales@aquarius.com.au
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 11 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: logging outputFrom: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>Date: Sun, 05 Jul 1998 21:51:27 -0700
Glen Harvy wrote:> > I'm trying to configure a Lantronixs LSR16 to use RadiusNT. There are> obviously problems however the screen scrolls when using "radius -x15" so> it's impossible for me to read the error messages.> > How do you obtain a text file log of the output?
With RadiusNT 2.5, define a logfile in the admin. You can also definean AcctLogFile in the registry if you want to split the accounting andauthentication (which might make it easier to follow).
You can always hit the Pause key to stop the scroll as well. :)Enter will let it continue.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 12 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: USR Upagrde problemFrom: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>Date: Sun, 05 Jul 1998 22:10:29 -0700
2Day Internet wrote:> > I have just upgraded the firmware on our Netserver/8i from rev 3.2.5.3 to> rev 4.0.14 authentication with RadiusNT 2.1.5 no longer works!> > If I create a local user account on NAS, it authenticates fine and> accounting records are created by Radius NT without problem.> > But if I try to get RadiusNT (ODBC / MS SQL Server 6.5) to authenticate...> > RadiusNT displays 'Malformed Packet' messages. Any ideas?
Check which version of RadiusNT you are running. 2.1.5 doesn'texist. RadiusNT 2.5.124 and higher default to allowing the 0 lengthmalformed packet problem. The others it still doesn't allow. If youuse "radius -x15 -X" in the foreground, RadiusNT will dump the packet.If you send that dump to me, I'll tell you why the packet ismalformed.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 13 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: Newbie Question about ISDN connactionsFrom: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>Date: Sun, 05 Jul 1998 22:41:10 -0700
David Moore wrote:> > We are using USR TC, our modems are appearing in the on line list but how do> I get ISDN calls to show up in the on Line list.
If I remember right, the USR uses a different numbering for the ISDN.Therefore, you will need to add additional Ports for the Server inthe Emerald Admin. You can run RadiusNT in -x15 debug mode to seewhat the numbers for the ISDN is.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 14 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: LANtronix LSR16From: Glen Harvy <root@aquarius.com.au>Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 15:53:51 +1000
Hi,
I am having trouble getting the above to work with RadiusNT.
The password is all garbage but the secrets are correctly specified.
The NAS-Identifier keeps coming up as 99.111.109.115 notwithstanding I haveentered comserv2 as the NAS name.
What can be the cause of this?
Glen.--------------------------------------------------------------------AQUARIUS Communications for all your Internet<>Fidonet needs <>Full ISP services<>FrontDoor Commercial<>TransX Internet/FTSC Mailervoice(02)9977-3788<>fax(02)9977-3844<>bbs(02)9977-2855<>3:714/930http://www.aquarius.com.au <> mailto:sales@aquarius.com.au
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 15 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: USR Upagrde problemFrom: "2Day Internet" <peter@2day.net.nz>Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 17:57:25 +1200
>exist. RadiusNT 2.5.124 and higher default to allowing the 0 length>malformed packet problem. The others it still doesn't allow. If you>use "radius -x15 -X" in the foreground, RadiusNT will dump the packet.>If you send that dump to me, I'll tell you why the packet is>malformed.
Malformed packet problem gone away now...
Sorry, bad hair day. I should *never* have believed 3Com when they said toupgrade firmware on Netserver from v3.2.5.3 to v4.1.7
I am happy RadiusNT is performing ok, so my bleating is inappropriate forthis list. If there are any Netserver saavy people subscribed I wouldappreciate a private email. I have been off the air for 8 hours now, anyany clues would be appreciated.
NAS no longer authenticates using Radius but ok with local. I see radiusdebug of
Sending Ack of id 7 to cb621a82 (akl-netserv1.2day.net.nz)
User-Service = Framed-User Framed-Protocol = PPP Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobsen-TCP-IP
Resp Time: 491 Auth 2/0 -> 2 Acct: 0/0/0 -> 0
Win95 client gets error "Dailup networking could not negotiate a compatibleset of network protocols ..."
It also appears the NAS wont accept framed-address settings for specified IPaddresses on other user profiles (just as serious problem!)
regards
Peter MottChief Enthusiast2Day Internet Limited.
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 16 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: USR Upagrde problemFrom: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>Date: Sun, 05 Jul 1998 23:20:51 -0700
2Day Internet wrote:> > NAS no longer authenticates using Radius but ok with local. I see radius> debug of> > Sending Ack of id 7 to cb621a82 (akl-netserv1.2day.net.nz)> > User-Service = Framed-User> Framed-Protocol = PPP> Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobsen-TCP-IP> > Resp Time: 491 Auth 2/0 -> 2 Acct: 0/0/0 -> 0
This could be an issue with IP Addresses. Using the latest RadiusNT,go into the Admin and choose your primary IP address from the list.Does the USR have any kind of debug to see what the issue is? Itlooks like RadiusNT is working fine.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com