Malformed Packet w/ Ascend and Rad2.5

George Mansoor ( "George )
Tue, 30 Jun 1998 21:16:14 -0700

--------------642EE3DADEDAF99D0D298E3A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I saw the following in the mail archives:

> Steve Luper wrote:
> > 2.5 looks good and I can do ODBC with WINNT using radlogin
but when
> > trying to use 2.5 in conjunction with an Ascend Max 2012,
I get
> > &quotMalformed packet" everytime a user tries to
authenticate.
>
> From: Dale E. Reed Jr. &ltdaler@iea-software.com>
> If you send me a -x15 -X capture of the packet, I'll quote
the
> RFC telling you why its Malformed so you can send it to
Ascend.
> You might want to check which version of AOS you are
running.
> Anything before 5.0Ap42 is pretty problem proned.

For the record, Maxes with 6.0.2 do the same thing. I added
the registry
entry and that &quotfixed" the problem. Have you (Dale) sent
support@ascend.com anything on this issue?

Josh Hillman
hillman@talstar.com

There's a referecned to a a registry entry. What is this registry entry
that needs to be fixed?

thanks

George

--------------642EE3DADEDAF99D0D298E3A
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I saw the following in the mail archives:
 

> Steve Luper wrote:
> > 2.5 looks good and I can do ODBC with WINNT using radlogin butwhen
> > trying to use 2.5 in conjunction with an Ascend Max 2012, I get
> > &quotMalformed packet" everytime a user tries to authenticate.
>
> From: Dale E. Reed Jr. &ltdaler@iea-software.com>
> If you send me a -x15 -X capture of the packet, I'll quote the
> RFC telling you why its Malformed so you can send it to Ascend.
> You might want to check which version of AOS you are running.
> Anything before 5.0Ap42 is pretty problem proned.

For the record, Maxes with 6.0.2 do the same thing. I added the registry
entry and that &quotfixed" the problem. Have you (Dale) sent
support@ascend.com anything on this issue?

Josh Hillman
hillman@talstar.com

There's a referecned to a a registry entry.  What is this registryentry that needs to be fixed?

thanks

George--------------642EE3DADEDAF99D0D298E3A--