RE: LAN/Routing question

David Scott ( (no email) )
Tue, 25 Aug 1998 16:26:57 -0500

My $.02 - We've been using a pipeline 50 for about 2 years now, no firmware
upgrades or anything, and our uptime is terrific. No lock-ups here.

David Scott
davidscott@mtgroup.com
http://www.access-developer.com
http://www.mtgroup.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
> [mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of Rudy Komsic
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 4:18 PM
> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> Subject: Re: LAN/Routing question
>
>
> you sure you want to use the ascend pipeline?
> we have a client connected to us who says that he needs to reboot
> his router
> about every 5-6 days since his router seems to lock up. I would
> rather use a
> Cisco router for this job since it is scalable and you can easily
> switch to a
> high pipe when needed with not much extra costs.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Payer +ADw-david.payer+AEA-ia-omni.com+AD4-
> To: ntisp+AEA-iea-software.com +ADw-ntisp+AEA-iea-software.com+AD4-
> Date: August 25, 1998 5:18 PM
> Subject: LAN/Routing question
>
>
> +AD4-I will be expanding to a nearby city to provide dialup
> service. I want to
> +AD4-temporarily use a bonded ISDN line for the feed from there to here.
> +AD4-
> +AD4-I have a Class C license of addresses.
> +AD4-
> +AD4-I plan to use a Pipeline 25 on both ends and then run a term
> server on the
> +AD4-other end.
> +AD4-
> +AD4-Do I need to subnet and route or can I simply bridge the two network
> +AD4-segments with the Pipeline?
> +AD4-
> +AD4-TIA,
> +AD4-
> +AD4-David Payer
> +AD4-
> +AD4-
>
>
>