- Danny
-----Original Message-----
From: greg Lowthian <greg@isat.com>
To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 9:35 AM
Subject: RE: Compaq vs. PM3
>They took about 2 to 3 weeks longer to release a V.90 upgrade
>but it has been stable and fast from the first release unlike others.
>
>>
>>
>> What ? PM3's still don't support V.90 ? Oh no !!
>>
>> - Danny
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ethan <ethan@fdt.net>
>> To: Preston Korn <preston@jaycreek.com>
>> Cc: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 9:15 AM
>> Subject: Re: Compaq vs. PM3
>>
>>
>> >I have several Portmaster 3's in remote areas and they work great. They
>> >are easy to configure and run for long periods of time without
>> >maintenance. The only drawback is that Lucent has been very slow in
>> >releasing the final version of V.90. They just can't seem to get
>> it right.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Preston Korn wrote:
>> >
>> >> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:04:29 -0700
>> >> From: Preston Korn <preston@jaycreek.com>
>> >> Reply-To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>
>
>> >> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>> >> Subject: Compaq vs. PM3
>> >>
>> >> Does anyone have any input on the compaq access servers vs the Lucent
>> PM3?
>> >> Which is better? Are they just as good? Which do you recommend?
>> >>
>> >> Preston
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >******************************************************
>> >Ethan Meiselman "ethan@fdt.net"
>> >NT Network Administrator
>> >Florida Digital Turnpike
>> >Public PGP Key http://gnv.fdt.net/~ethan/keys/pgp.txt
>> >******************************************************
>> >
>>
>>