On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Danny Sinang wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 09:12:56 +0800
> From: Danny Sinang <danny@uplink.com.ph>
> Reply-To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> Subject: Re: Compaq vs. PM3
>
> What ? PM3's still don't support V.90 ? Oh no !!
>
> - Danny
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ethan <ethan@fdt.net>
> To: Preston Korn <preston@jaycreek.com>
> Cc: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
> Date: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 9:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Compaq vs. PM3
>
>
> >I have several Portmaster 3's in remote areas and they work great. They
> >are easy to configure and run for long periods of time without
> >maintenance. The only drawback is that Lucent has been very slow in
> >releasing the final version of V.90. They just can't seem to get it right.
> >
> >
> >
> >On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Preston Korn wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:04:29 -0700
> >> From: Preston Korn <preston@jaycreek.com>
> >> Reply-To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> >> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> >> Subject: Compaq vs. PM3
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any input on the compaq access servers vs the Lucent
> PM3?
> >> Which is better? Are they just as good? Which do you recommend?
> >>
> >> Preston
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >******************************************************
> >Ethan Meiselman "ethan@fdt.net"
> >NT Network Administrator
> >Florida Digital Turnpike
> >Public PGP Key http://gnv.fdt.net/~ethan/keys/pgp.txt
> >******************************************************
> >
>
******************************************************
Ethan Meiselman "ethan@fdt.net"
NT Network Administrator
Florida Digital Turnpike
Public PGP Key http://gnv.fdt.net/~ethan/keys/pgp.txt
******************************************************