Message 2: Oops!!
from Gaby <gaby@inco.com.lb>
Message 3: Re: Oops!!
from Jon Nowell <jnowell@DIALNET.CO.UK>
Message 4: Re: Oops!!
from "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Message 5: IIS4 Problems...
from Brian Lube <brian@mpinet.net>
Message 6: Re: IIS4 Problems...
from Cyberop <losco@techie.com>
Message 7: IIS 4.0
from "Dave Simko" <dsimko@sunline.net>
Message 8: RE: IIS 4.0
from "Gregory Gooden (Annex)" <ggooden@exc1.annex.com>
Message 9: IIS4.0, is it worth it?
from "Beverly Wise" <bev@hyper-drive.com>
Message 10: Re: IIS4.0, is it worth it?
from Brian Lube <brian@mpinet.net>
Message 11: Fw: IIS4 Problems...
from "Adam Greene" <adam@webjogger.net>
Message 12: RE: IIS4 Problems...
from rkm@marshall.net (rkm)
Message 13: Re: IIS4.0, is it worth it?
from Michael Whisenant <mwhisen@airnet.net>
Message 14: RE: IIS4 Problems...
from "albert zegiel" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
Message 15: Re: IIS4 Problems...
from "Dan Waldron" <dan@diversified.com.au>
Message 16: Can TCP/IP be used to browse my network ?
from "Danny Sinang" <danny@uplink.com.ph>
Message 17: FS: USR MP/16, MP/16I, Digiboard EPC/X Cluster System
from "Rudy Komsic" <rudyk@cyberglobe.net>
Message 18: Re: Can TCP/IP be used to browse my network ?
from "David Payer" <david.payer@ia-omni.com>
Message 19: Re: Can TCP/IP be used to browse my network ?
from Dave Mussulman <dave@vircom.com>
Message 20: Re: IIS4 Problems...
from "Dave McLaughlin" <dave_mclaughlin@netmedia.com.au>
Message 21: OT: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
from "Danny Sinang" <danny@uplink.com.ph>
Message 22: RE: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
from Endre Palfi <endre@ufonet.net>
Message 23: Re: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
from "Danny Sinang" <danny@uplink.com.ph>
Message 24: Re: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
from "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Message 25: How could you log CGI CPU usage by domain on NT
from rfink@worldpassage.net (Richard Fink)
Message 26: Re: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
from Darryl Harvey <darryl@myemail.com.au>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 1 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject:
From: "Allen Armstrong" <allen@sd71.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 00:47:00 -0700
unsubscribe
..
If anyone knows how to unsubscribe from this list could they send
me a message?
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 2 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Oops!!
From: Gaby <gaby@inco.com.lb>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 11:52:20 +0200
>>Help!!!
>>
>>Guys, I need urgent help. I sent a message before but for some reason the
>>body was empty.
>>Well here goes all over again.
>>
>>The problem:
>>------------
>>
>>I have two networks 192.168.0.x and 192.168.100.x on two separte ethernet
>>segments.
>>That are only joined by a NT 4.0 Server with two network cards that I am
>>trying to make act
>>like a router.
>>
>>The server's first network
>>card has the following config: 192.168.0.15
>> 255.255.255.0
>>
>>The server's second network
>>card has the following config: 192.168.100.15
>> 255.255.255.0
>>
>>
>>NOTES!!!
>>--------
>>
>>1. The server can see both networks perfectly.
>>2. Stations can see both network cards on the
>> server perfectly.
>>3. Problem is the stations on one network can not see the stations on the
>other.
>>4. When I perform a ping. I do NOT get destination unreachable, however, I do
>> recieve a response time out error.
>>
>>ALSO...
>>-------
>>1. I have the gateway on the stations on network 192.168.0.x set to
>192.168.0.15
>> the network card on the server.
>>2. I have RIP installed if that effects it. I don't think so though.
>>3. I have IP forwarding turned ON.
>>
>>Below is the routing table printed when I execute ROUTE PRINT on the NT box.
>>
>>Active Routes:
>>
>>
>>
>> Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface Metric
>>
>> 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
>>
>> 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15 1
>>
>> 192.168.0.15 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
>>
>> 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15 1
>>
>> 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15 1
>>
>> 192.168.100.15 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
>>
>> 192.168.100.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15 1
>>
>> 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15 1
>>
>> 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15 1
>>
>> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15 1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Anyone have any ideas? Please help..... =(
>>
>>Gab.
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 3 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Oops!!
From: Jon Nowell <jnowell@DIALNET.CO.UK>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 10:09:10 +0100
Gaby,
I had a similar problem a few weeks ago and this is how I solved it.
1. Removed NIC cards completely from metwork control Applet
2. Downloaded most recent drivers from Supplier
3. Added both cards using new driver
And hey presto it all started working.
Alternatively you could try another make of NIC cards or perhaps although a
little extreme you could use RRAS which is a bit more robust than the basic
Tcp/ip routing provided by NT 4.
Good Luck
Jon
----------
> From: Gaby <gaby@inco.com.lb>
> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> Cc: nt-isp@iea-software.com
> Subject: Oops!!
> Date: 13 July 1998 10:52
>
> >>Help!!!
> >>
> >>Guys, I need urgent help. I sent a message before but for some reason
the
> >>body was empty.
> >>Well here goes all over again.
> >>
> >>The problem:
> >>------------
> >>
> >>I have two networks 192.168.0.x and 192.168.100.x on two separte
ethernet
> >>segments.
> >>That are only joined by a NT 4.0 Server with two network cards that I
am
> >>trying to make act
> >>like a router.
> >>
> >>The server's first network
> >>card has the following config: 192.168.0.15
> >> 255.255.255.0
> >>
> >>The server's second network
> >>card has the following config: 192.168.100.15
> >> 255.255.255.0
> >>
> >>
> >>NOTES!!!
> >>--------
> >>
> >>1. The server can see both networks perfectly.
> >>2. Stations can see both network cards on the
> >> server perfectly.
> >>3. Problem is the stations on one network can not see the stations on
the
> >other.
> >>4. When I perform a ping. I do NOT get destination unreachable,
however, I do
> >> recieve a response time out error.
> >>
> >>ALSO...
> >>-------
> >>1. I have the gateway on the stations on network 192.168.0.x set to
> >192.168.0.15
> >> the network card on the server.
> >>2. I have RIP installed if that effects it. I don't think so though.
> >>3. I have IP forwarding turned ON.
> >>
> >>Below is the routing table printed when I execute ROUTE PRINT on the NT
box.
> >>
> >>Active Routes:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface
Metric
> >>
> >> 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
> >>
> >> 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
1
> >>
> >> 192.168.0.15 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
> >>
> >> 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
1
> >>
> >> 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
1
> >>
> >> 192.168.100.15 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
> >>
> >> 192.168.100.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
1
> >>
> >> 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
1
> >>
> >> 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
1
> >>
> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Anyone have any ideas? Please help..... =(
> >>
> >>Gab.
> >
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 4 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Oops!!
From: "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 09:58:30 -0500
I would highly recommend installing RRAS for routing, it gives you much
better control of your routing tables and static routes.
Kevin Ingram
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Nowell <jnowell@DIALNET.CO.UK>
To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Monday, July 13, 1998 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: Oops!!
>Gaby,
>
>I had a similar problem a few weeks ago and this is how I solved it.
>
>1. Removed NIC cards completely from metwork control Applet
>2. Downloaded most recent drivers from Supplier
>3. Added both cards using new driver
>
>And hey presto it all started working.
>
>Alternatively you could try another make of NIC cards or perhaps although a
>little extreme you could use RRAS which is a bit more robust than the basic
>Tcp/ip routing provided by NT 4.
>
>Good Luck
>
>Jon
>
>----------
>> From: Gaby <gaby@inco.com.lb>
>> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>> Cc: nt-isp@iea-software.com
>> Subject: Oops!!
>> Date: 13 July 1998 10:52
>>
>> >>Help!!!
>> >>
>> >>Guys, I need urgent help. I sent a message before but for some reason
>the
>> >>body was empty.
>> >>Well here goes all over again.
>> >>
>> >>The problem:
>> >>------------
>> >>
>> >>I have two networks 192.168.0.x and 192.168.100.x on two separte
>ethernet
>> >>segments.
>> >>That are only joined by a NT 4.0 Server with two network cards that I
>am
>> >>trying to make act
>> >>like a router.
>> >>
>> >>The server's first network
>> >>card has the following config: 192.168.0.15
>> >> 255.255.255.0
>> >>
>> >>The server's second network
>> >>card has the following config: 192.168.100.15
>> >> 255.255.255.0
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>NOTES!!!
>> >>--------
>> >>
>> >>1. The server can see both networks perfectly.
>> >>2. Stations can see both network cards on the
>> >> server perfectly.
>> >>3. Problem is the stations on one network can not see the stations on
>the
>> >other.
>> >>4. When I perform a ping. I do NOT get destination unreachable,
>however, I do
>> >> recieve a response time out error.
>> >>
>> >>ALSO...
>> >>-------
>> >>1. I have the gateway on the stations on network 192.168.0.x set to
>> >192.168.0.15
>> >> the network card on the server.
>> >>2. I have RIP installed if that effects it. I don't think so though.
>> >>3. I have IP forwarding turned ON.
>> >>
>> >>Below is the routing table printed when I execute ROUTE PRINT on the NT
>box.
>> >>
>> >>Active Routes:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface
>Metric
>> >>
>> >> 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.0.15 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.100.15 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 192.168.100.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.0.15 192.168.0.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.100.15 192.168.100.15
> 1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Anyone have any ideas? Please help..... =(
>> >>
>> >>Gab.
>> >
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 5 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: IIS4 Problems...
From: Brian Lube <brian@mpinet.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 11:53:40 -0400
It seems that the Microsoft v.4 bug has arisen again (once more to the loss
of my hair).
I'm having a problem with IIS4 on NT Server 4. It locks all files for
exclusive use all the time. I've got customers calling in saying that they
cannot update their pages, all the time. I'm not able to remove people's
sites after they quit. I've got my Creative Services team starting up a
lynching mob.
Anyone got any ideas on this?
Thanks!
Brian Lube
System Administrator
MPInet
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 6 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: IIS4 Problems...
From: Cyberop <losco@techie.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 09:03:07 -0700
I ran across this
the timeout is set way to high for open connections to the web server, when
I installed it it was set to 900 seconds, it locks the pages and their that
anyone is looking at for that 900 seconds, and if someone reloads then the
time starts over. I changed the timeout to 120 and have had no problems
since.
At 11:53 AM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>It seems that the Microsoft v.4 bug has arisen again (once more to the loss
>of my hair).
>
>I'm having a problem with IIS4 on NT Server 4. It locks all files for
>exclusive use all the time. I've got customers calling in saying that they
>cannot update their pages, all the time. I'm not able to remove people's
>sites after they quit. I've got my Creative Services team starting up a
>lynching mob.
>
>Anyone got any ideas on this?
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>Brian Lube
>System Administrator
>MPInet
>
>http://www.mpinet.net
>
On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew the first
strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of Hamlet, and
Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony. And Windows98 Crashed!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carlo Krun
cyberop@is-plus.net
System Administrator 541-955-8564 http://www.is-plus.net
Internet Solutions Plus, Inc. 541-955-8564
225 SE 8th St FAX - 541-955-9141
Grants Pass, Or 97526
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 7 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: IIS 4.0
From: "Dave Simko" <dsimko@sunline.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 12:15:59 -0400
Problem:
When I try to setup a new website thru the "website wizard" from a remote
workstation running iis 4 for administration purposes. I only get the ip of
the server the websites are running as a choice for the new website's ip
address on and not the available ones I have setup in the network in
control panel. But if i go and set the website thru the "website wizard" on
the local server I see all the ip address loaded on that server, any
thoughts?
_______________________
Thank You
Dave Simko, MCP
Sunline System Administrator
http://www.sunline.net
dsimko@sunline.net
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 8 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RE: IIS 4.0
From: "Gregory Gooden (Annex)" <ggooden@exc1.annex.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 09:14:34 -0700
I believe that's just the nature of the beast, unfortunately...
Gregory
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Simko [mailto:dsimko@sunline.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 9:16 AM
> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> Subject: IIS 4.0
>
>
> Problem:
>
> When I try to setup a new website thru the "website wizard"
> from a remote
> workstation running iis 4 for administration purposes. I only
> get the ip of
> the server the websites are running as a choice for the new
> website's ip
> address on and not the available ones I have setup in the network in
> control panel. But if i go and set the website thru the
> "website wizard" on
> the local server I see all the ip address loaded on that server, any
> thoughts?
>
> _______________________
> Thank You
> Dave Simko, MCP
> Sunline System Administrator
> http://www.sunline.net
> dsimko@sunline.net
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 9 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: IIS4.0, is it worth it?
From: "Beverly Wise" <bev@hyper-drive.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 13:03:55 -0400
I am running NT 4.0 SP3 with IIS 3.0, I was wondering the opinions of the
people on this list of how much is it worth to upgrade to IIS 4.0. I have
known people to upgrade, then have problems because they used the alias of a
tilde (~) example, http://www.isp.net/~userid Like with UNIX. I have not
had any problems yet. What are the pros and cons of IIS 4.0? Are there
any? Would appreciate input very much!
Beverly L. Wise
Systems Operator
Falls City Net Services
http://www.fallscity.net
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 10 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: IIS4.0, is it worth it?
From: Brian Lube <brian@mpinet.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 14:06:01 -0400
The biggest improvement (IMHO) is multiple domains. You can have multiple
domains now that are not all hooked off of the same root area with
mappings. Each domain has it's own logging capability, and can have it's
own anonymous directory. All of these things were important to us when we
made the decision to switch. Also, we've seen that IIS4 handles ASP better
than IIS3, and FP98 is built in.
That's just what we've noticed here as for IIS4. It a bit slower, but
seems to actually be an improvement (when you can find all those pesky
variable that one can miss <g>).
just my $.02
Brian Lube
MPInet
At 01:03 PM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
>I am running NT 4.0 SP3 with IIS 3.0, I was wondering the opinions of the
>people on this list of how much is it worth to upgrade to IIS 4.0. I have
>known people to upgrade, then have problems because they used the alias of a
>tilde (~) example, http://www.isp.net/~userid Like with UNIX. I have not
>had any problems yet. What are the pros and cons of IIS 4.0? Are there
>any? Would appreciate input very much!
>
>Beverly L. Wise
>Systems Operator
>Falls City Net Services
>http://www.fallscity.net
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 11 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Fw: IIS4 Problems...
From: "Adam Greene" <adam@webjogger.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 16:45:06 -0400
Brian,
If the problem you are having is that people are not able to FTP to their
directories on your web server, there is a very specific procedure I follow
to set up users on NT, to set permissions on directories, and to set up
virtual web sites in IIS4 that WORKS. If you'd like me to send you a copy
of the procedure, I can e-mail you a Word document attachment or fax it to
you.
If that's not your problem, then good luck!!!
Adam Greene
Webjogger Internet Services
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cyberop <losco@techie.com>
>To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>Date: 13 July 1998 12:04
>Subject: Re: IIS4 Problems...
>
>
>>I ran across this
>>the timeout is set way to high for open connections to the web server,
when
>>I installed it it was set to 900 seconds, it locks the pages and their
that
>>anyone is looking at for that 900 seconds, and if someone reloads then the
>>time starts over. I changed the timeout to 120 and have had no problems
>>since.
>>
>>
>>At 11:53 AM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>>
>>>It seems that the Microsoft v.4 bug has arisen again (once more to the
>loss
>>>of my hair).
>>>
>>>I'm having a problem with IIS4 on NT Server 4. It locks all files for
>>>exclusive use all the time. I've got customers calling in saying that
>they
>>>cannot update their pages, all the time. I'm not able to remove people's
>>>sites after they quit. I've got my Creative Services team starting up a
>>>lynching mob.
>>>
>>>Anyone got any ideas on this?
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>Brian Lube
>>>System Administrator
>>>MPInet
>>>
>>>http://www.mpinet.net
>>>
>>
>>On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew the first
>>strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of Hamlet, and
>>Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony. And Windows98 Crashed!
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>-
>>Carlo Krun
>>cyberop@is-plus.net
>>System Administrator 541-955-8564
http://www.is-plus.net
>>Internet Solutions Plus, Inc. 541-955-8564
>>225 SE 8th St FAX - 541-955-9141
>>Grants Pass, Or 97526
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>-
>>
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 12 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RE: IIS4 Problems...
From: rkm@marshall.net (rkm)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 16:47:08 -0400
Adam, I'd love to see how you do it to compare notes.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
> [mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of Adam Greene
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 4:45 PM
> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> Subject: Fw: IIS4 Problems...
>
>
> Brian,
>
> If the problem you are having is that people are not able to FTP to their
> directories on your web server, there is a very specific
> procedure I follow
> to set up users on NT, to set permissions on directories, and to set up
> virtual web sites in IIS4 that WORKS. If you'd like me to send you a copy
> of the procedure, I can e-mail you a Word document attachment or fax it to
> you.
>
> If that's not your problem, then good luck!!!
>
> Adam Greene
> Webjogger Internet Services
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Cyberop <losco@techie.com>
> >To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
> >Date: 13 July 1998 12:04
> >Subject: Re: IIS4 Problems...
> >
> >
> >>I ran across this
> >>the timeout is set way to high for open connections to the web server,
> when
> >>I installed it it was set to 900 seconds, it locks the pages and their
> that
> >>anyone is looking at for that 900 seconds, and if someone
> reloads then the
> >>time starts over. I changed the timeout to 120 and have had no problems
> >>since.
> >>
> >>
> >>At 11:53 AM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
> >>>
> >>>It seems that the Microsoft v.4 bug has arisen again (once more to the
> >loss
> >>>of my hair).
> >>>
> >>>I'm having a problem with IIS4 on NT Server 4. It locks all files for
> >>>exclusive use all the time. I've got customers calling in saying that
> >they
> >>>cannot update their pages, all the time. I'm not able to
> remove people's
> >>>sites after they quit. I've got my Creative Services team
> starting up a
> >>>lynching mob.
> >>>
> >>>Anyone got any ideas on this?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Brian Lube
> >>>System Administrator
> >>>MPInet
> >>>
> >>>http://www.mpinet.net
> >>>
> >>
> >>On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew the first
> >>strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of
> Hamlet, and
> >>Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony. And Windows98 Crashed!
> >>
> >>----------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> -
> >-
> >>Carlo Krun
> >>cyberop@is-plus.net
> >>System Administrator 541-955-8564
> http://www.is-plus.net
> >>Internet Solutions Plus, Inc. 541-955-8564
> >>225 SE 8th St FAX - 541-955-9141
> >>Grants Pass, Or 97526
> >>----------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> -
> >-
> >>
> >
>
>
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 13 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: IIS4.0, is it worth it?
From: Michael Whisenant <mwhisen@airnet.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 16:17:09 -0500
So Brian (or anyone else on the list);
Is there a method in IIS4 to give someone FP extensions on a sub web
without that person being in the NT SAM database? If not then I imagine
you have a groups of users in a local group that have very restricted
rights? Can you give me an example. I have made sure the machine is NOT a
domain controller, backup controller, etc, just a plain server. I really
do not want to have several thousands of domain users running around trying
to manage. I wished that NT had a reality check on managing users and a
directory method that was logical.
I am looking to change to IIS4, but do not want to set up groups and
permissions to a directory structure in the OS for simple web publishing.
At 02:06 PM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
>The biggest improvement (IMHO) is multiple domains. You can have multiple
>domains now that are not all hooked off of the same root area with
>mappings. Each domain has it's own logging capability, and can have it's
>own anonymous directory. All of these things were important to us when we
>made the decision to switch. Also, we've seen that IIS4 handles ASP better
>than IIS3, and FP98 is built in.
>
>That's just what we've noticed here as for IIS4. It a bit slower, but
>seems to actually be an improvement (when you can find all those pesky
>variable that one can miss <g>).
>
>just my $.02
>
>Brian Lube
>MPInet
>
>http://www.mpinet.net
>
>At 01:03 PM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>I am running NT 4.0 SP3 with IIS 3.0, I was wondering the opinions of the
>>people on this list of how much is it worth to upgrade to IIS 4.0. I have
>>known people to upgrade, then have problems because they used the alias of a
>>tilde (~) example, http://www.isp.net/~userid Like with UNIX. I have not
>>had any problems yet. What are the pros and cons of IIS 4.0? Are there
>>any? Would appreciate input very much!
>>
>>Beverly L. Wise
>>Systems Operator
>>Falls City Net Services
>>http://www.fallscity.net
>>
>
Michael J. Whisenant
Vice-President, Operations
AIRnet Internet Services, Inc.
ph: (256) 704-4692 fax: (256) 704-2329
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 14 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RE: IIS4 Problems...
From: "albert zegiel" <emmanuel@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 16:46:08 -0700
if it is not to much to ask, i would love to have you email me the
procedures you spoke of also..thanks, al
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
> [mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of rkm
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 1:47 PM
> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> Subject: RE: IIS4 Problems...
>
>
> Adam, I'd love to see how you do it to compare notes.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
> > [mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of Adam Greene
> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 4:45 PM
> > To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> > Subject: Fw: IIS4 Problems...
> >
> >
> > Brian,
> >
> > If the problem you are having is that people are not able to
> FTP to their
> > directories on your web server, there is a very specific
> > procedure I follow
> > to set up users on NT, to set permissions on directories, and to set up
> > virtual web sites in IIS4 that WORKS. If you'd like me to send
> you a copy
> > of the procedure, I can e-mail you a Word document attachment
> or fax it to
> > you.
> >
> > If that's not your problem, then good luck!!!
> >
> > Adam Greene
> > Webjogger Internet Services
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Cyberop <losco@techie.com>
> > >To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
> > >Date: 13 July 1998 12:04
> > >Subject: Re: IIS4 Problems...
> > >
> > >
> > >>I ran across this
> > >>the timeout is set way to high for open connections to the web server,
> > when
> > >>I installed it it was set to 900 seconds, it locks the pages and their
> > that
> > >>anyone is looking at for that 900 seconds, and if someone
> > reloads then the
> > >>time starts over. I changed the timeout to 120 and have had
> no problems
> > >>since.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>At 11:53 AM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>It seems that the Microsoft v.4 bug has arisen again (once
> more to the
> > >loss
> > >>>of my hair).
> > >>>
> > >>>I'm having a problem with IIS4 on NT Server 4. It locks all
> files for
> > >>>exclusive use all the time. I've got customers calling in
> saying that
> > >they
> > >>>cannot update their pages, all the time. I'm not able to
> > remove people's
> > >>>sites after they quit. I've got my Creative Services team
> > starting up a
> > >>>lynching mob.
> > >>>
> > >>>Anyone got any ideas on this?
> > >>>
> > >>>Thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Brian Lube
> > >>>System Administrator
> > >>>MPInet
> > >>>
> > >>>http://www.mpinet.net
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew
> the first
> > >>strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of
> > Hamlet, and
> > >>Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony. And Windows98 Crashed!
> > >>
> > >>----------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > -
> > >-
> > >>Carlo Krun
> > >>cyberop@is-plus.net
> > >>System Administrator 541-955-8564
> > http://www.is-plus.net
> > >>Internet Solutions Plus, Inc. 541-955-8564
> > >>225 SE 8th St FAX - 541-955-9141
> > >>Grants Pass, Or 97526
> > >>----------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > -
> > >-
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 15 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: IIS4 Problems...
From: "Dan Waldron" <dan@diversified.com.au>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:04:09 +1000
I'd like a copy too! :-) I have no trouble running Serv-U and IIS4 (as well
as IIS 3) with FP installed.
Rgds
Dan
-------------------------------------------
Dan Waldron
Diversified Data
dan@diversified.com.au
http://www.diversified.com.au
Ph: 0417-659-828 (+61-417-659-828)
Fx: 02-9832-0951 (+61-2-9832-0951)
-----Original Message-----
From: albert zegiel <emmanuel@mwt.net>
To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Tuesday, 14 July 1998 7:56
Subject: RE: IIS4 Problems...
>if it is not to much to ask, i would love to have you email me the
>procedures you spoke of also..thanks, al
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
>> [mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of rkm
>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 1:47 PM
>> To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>> Subject: RE: IIS4 Problems...
>>
>>
>> Adam, I'd love to see how you do it to compare notes.
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
>> > [mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of Adam Greene
>> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 4:45 PM
>> > To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>> > Subject: Fw: IIS4 Problems...
>> >
>> >
>> > Brian,
>> >
>> > If the problem you are having is that people are not able to
>> FTP to their
>> > directories on your web server, there is a very specific
>> > procedure I follow
>> > to set up users on NT, to set permissions on directories, and to set up
>> > virtual web sites in IIS4 that WORKS. If you'd like me to send
>> you a copy
>> > of the procedure, I can e-mail you a Word document attachment
>> or fax it to
>> > you.
>> >
>> > If that's not your problem, then good luck!!!
>> >
>> > Adam Greene
>> > Webjogger Internet Services
>> >
>> > >-----Original Message-----
>> > >From: Cyberop <losco@techie.com>
>> > >To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>> > >Date: 13 July 1998 12:04
>> > >Subject: Re: IIS4 Problems...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>I ran across this
>> > >>the timeout is set way to high for open connections to the web
server,
>> > when
>> > >>I installed it it was set to 900 seconds, it locks the pages and
their
>> > that
>> > >>anyone is looking at for that 900 seconds, and if someone
>> > reloads then the
>> > >>time starts over. I changed the timeout to 120 and have had
>> no problems
>> > >>since.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>At 11:53 AM 7/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>It seems that the Microsoft v.4 bug has arisen again (once
>> more to the
>> > >loss
>> > >>>of my hair).
>> > >>>
>> > >>>I'm having a problem with IIS4 on NT Server 4. It locks all
>> files for
>> > >>>exclusive use all the time. I've got customers calling in
>> saying that
>> > >they
>> > >>>cannot update their pages, all the time. I'm not able to
>> > remove people's
>> > >>>sites after they quit. I've got my Creative Services team
>> > starting up a
>> > >>>lynching mob.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>Anyone got any ideas on this?
>> > >>>
>> > >>>Thanks!
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>Brian Lube
>> > >>>System Administrator
>> > >>>MPInet
>> > >>>
>> > >>>http://www.mpinet.net
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew
>> the first
>> > >>strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of
>> > Hamlet, and
>> > >>Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony. And Windows98 Crashed!
>> > >>
>> > >>----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ----------
>> > -
>> > >-
>> > >>Carlo Krun
>> > >>cyberop@is-plus.net
>> > >>System Administrator 541-955-8564
>> > http://www.is-plus.net
>> > >>Internet Solutions Plus, Inc. 541-955-8564
>> > >>225 SE 8th St FAX - 541-955-9141
>> > >>Grants Pass, Or 97526
>> > >>----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ----------
>> > -
>> > >-
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 16 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Can TCP/IP be used to browse my network ?
From: "Danny Sinang" <danny@uplink.com.ph>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 06:26:59 +0800
Hello.
Can clients running Windows 95 browse my network using just TCP/IP ?
I mean, they dial into my NT4 RRAS server which only accepts or allows
TCP/IP for dial ins.
Danny Sinang
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 17 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: FS: USR MP/16, MP/16I, Digiboard EPC/X Cluster System
From: "Rudy Komsic" <rudyk@cyberglobe.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 18:38:37 -0400
Deadline is tomorrow...
>Items still for sale available. Goto http://www.cyberglobe.net/forsale/ to
>see the Items for sale.
>
>Deadline: July 14, 1998
>
>Make me a reasonable offer for the items. Thank you.
>----
>Rudy Komsic
>President, Network Administrator - Cyberglobe Communications Inc.
>4996 Place de la Savane, Suite 200, Montreal, Quebec, H4P 1Z6
>Tel: (514)342-3883 Fax: (514)342-5139 E-Mail: rudyk@cyberglobe.net
>
>
>PS: Sorry for repeating the message.
>
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 18 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Can TCP/IP be used to browse my network ?
From: "David Payer" <david.payer@ia-omni.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 18:05:44 -0500
Subject: Can TCP/IP be used to browse my network ?
>Hello.
>
>Can clients running Windows 95 browse my network using just TCP/IP ?
>
>I mean, they dial into my NT4 RRAS server which only accepts or allows
>TCP/IP for dial ins.
>
>Danny Sinang
>
If you have enabled sharing, yes.
David Payer
OMNI Internet
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 19 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Can TCP/IP be used to browse my network ?
From: Dave Mussulman <dave@vircom.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 18:29:34 -0500
At 06:05 PM 7/13/98 , you wrote:
>Subject: Can TCP/IP be used to browse my network ?
>
>>Can clients running Windows 95 browse my network using just TCP/IP ?
>
>If you have enabled sharing, yes.
And if both computers, under their respective TCP/IP properties | Bindings
has File and Printer sharing for Microsoft Networks checked.
Dave Mussulman
Vircom Technical Support / Voice: (514) 990-2532
mailto:support@vircom.com / http://www.vircom.com / telnet://game-master.com
Provide content as well as access! Expand your services to include a
3D-graphical, multiplayer adventure online game. The 4th Coming is now
on sale to Internet Service Providers. http://www.the4thcoming.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 20 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: IIS4 Problems...
From: "Dave McLaughlin" <dave_mclaughlin@netmedia.com.au>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:38:26 +1000
Adam,
Could you e-mail that doument when you get a chance...
Thanks
Dave
support@netmedia.com.au
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Greene <adam@webjogger.net>
To: <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Tuesday, 14 July 1998 3:50
Subject: Fw: IIS4 Problems...
>Brian,
>
>If the problem you are having is that people are not able to FTP to their
>directories on your web server, there is a very specific procedure I follow
>to set up users on NT, to set permissions on directories, and to set up
>virtual web sites in IIS4 that WORKS. If you'd like me to send you a copy
>of the procedure, I can e-mail you a Word document attachment or fax it to
>you.
>
>If that's not your problem, then good luck!!!
>
>Adam Greene
>Webjogger Internet Services
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 21 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: OT: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
From: "Danny Sinang" <danny@uplink.com.ph>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:21:00 +0800
Hello.
Does anybody know what the pinout of a straight thru serial cable looks like
?
Danny Sinang
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 22 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RE: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
From: Endre Palfi <endre@ufonet.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 17:25:52 -0700
Let me guess: "Straight Thru" (is this a joke?)
> ----------
> From: Danny Sinang[SMTP:danny@uplink.com.ph]
> Reply To: ntisp@iea-software.com
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 5:21 PM
> To: NTISP
> Subject: OT: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>
> Hello.
>
> Does anybody know what the pinout of a straight thru serial cable
> looks like
> ?
>
> Danny Sinang
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 23 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
From: "Danny Sinang" <danny@uplink.com.ph>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:40:19 +0800
I tried using a cable labeled Pin to Pin - or what you might possibly call a
Straight Thru pinout. But it doesn't work.
So I was hoping maybe someone knowledgable could show me the right pinout.
Danny Sinang
-----Original Message-----
From: Endre Palfi <endre@ufonet.net>
To: 'ntisp@iea-software.com' <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 14, 1998 8:31 AM
Subject: RE: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>Let me guess: "Straight Thru" (is this a joke?)
>
>> ----------
>> From: Danny Sinang[SMTP:danny@uplink.com.ph]
>> Reply To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 5:21 PM
>> To: NTISP
>> Subject: OT: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Does anybody know what the pinout of a straight thru serial cable
>> looks like
>> ?
>>
>> Danny Sinang
>>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 24 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
From: "Kevin Ingram" <kingram@cameron.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 22:49:34 -0500
Are you trying to connect two serial ports together by cable? If so I can
give you a pinout, which will connect 2 Win95 machines or two NT servers
using Direct Cable Connection and this serial cable as a "modem".
Kevin Ingram
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Sinang <danny@uplink.com.ph>
To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Date: Monday, July 13, 1998 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>I tried using a cable labeled Pin to Pin - or what you might possibly call
a
>Straight Thru pinout. But it doesn't work.
>
>So I was hoping maybe someone knowledgable could show me the right pinout.
>
>Danny Sinang
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Endre Palfi <endre@ufonet.net>
>To: 'ntisp@iea-software.com' <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>Date: Tuesday, July 14, 1998 8:31 AM
>Subject: RE: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>
>
>>Let me guess: "Straight Thru" (is this a joke?)
>>
>>> ----------
>>> From: Danny Sinang[SMTP:danny@uplink.com.ph]
>>> Reply To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 5:21 PM
>>> To: NTISP
>>> Subject: OT: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Does anybody know what the pinout of a straight thru serial cable
>>> looks like
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Danny Sinang
>>>
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 25 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: How could you log CGI CPU usage by domain on NT
From: rfink@worldpassage.net (Richard Fink)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 21:57:24 -0700
We want to be able to monitor/log CGI CPU usage by domain on an NT Web Server so we can charge for excess utilization. We use O'Reilly WebSite Pro 2.0 which allows us to run a domain's CGI in a NT User's security context. Since each domain can be set up as an NT User we could track the domain's CPU usage by "NT User", if we knew how.
How can this be done ? Except for PM I am not aware of any CPU logging services.
Has anybody accomplished this ?
Thanks.
-Ric
=====================================================================
Richard Fink Tel: 415 381-0215
WorldPassage Fax: 415 381-0822
P.O.Box 2339 rfink@worldpassage.net
Mill Valley, CA 94942 http://www.worldpassage.net
WorldPassage is a communications service and Internet Service
Provider owned and operated by RainTree Computer Systems, Inc.
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 26 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
From: Darryl Harvey <darryl@myemail.com.au>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 15:53:12 +1000
You will need to "swap" a few of the lines.
Your options are:-
Table A-1 Null Modem Cable
Pins
(Port) Name Definition Direction Pins (Terminal)
2 TXD Transmit Data Output 3
3 RXD Receive Data Input 2
4 RTS Request to Send Output 5
5 CTS Clear to Send Input 4
6,8 DCD Data Carrier Input 20
Detect
7 GND Ground 7
20 DTR Data Terminal Output 6,8
Ready
Straight-through Cable
Table A-2 Straight-Through Cable
Pins (Port) Name Definition Direction Pins (Modem)
2 TXD Transmit Data Output 2
3 RXD Receive Data Input 3
4 RTS Request to Send Output 4
5 CTS Clear to Send Input 5
6 DSR Data Set Ready Not used 6
7 SGND Signal Ground 7
8 DCD Data Carrier Input 8
Detect
20 DTR Data Terminal Output 20
Ready
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Danny Sinang <danny@uplink.com.ph>
>To: ntisp@iea-software.com <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>Date: Monday, July 13, 1998 7:38 PM
>Subject: Re: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>
>
>>I tried using a cable labeled Pin to Pin - or what you might possibly call
>a
>>Straight Thru pinout. But it doesn't work.
>>
>>So I was hoping maybe someone knowledgable could show me the right pinout.
>>
>>Danny Sinang
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Endre Palfi <endre@ufonet.net>
>>To: 'ntisp@iea-software.com' <ntisp@iea-software.com>
>>Date: Tuesday, July 14, 1998 8:31 AM
>>Subject: RE: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>>
>>
>>>Let me guess: "Straight Thru" (is this a joke?)
>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> From: Danny Sinang[SMTP:danny@uplink.com.ph]
>>>> Reply To: ntisp@iea-software.com
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 5:21 PM
>>>> To: NTISP
>>>> Subject: OT: Pinout of straight thru serial cable
>>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> Does anybody know what the pinout of a straight thru serial cable
>>>> looks like
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Danny Sinang
>>>>
>>
>