Mail failure

POSTMASTER@nrc.com.au
Wed, 10 Jun 1998 08:00:00 +1000

FROM: NRSYD/NRPSYD/POSTMASTER
TO: ntisp@iea-software.com DATE: 10-06-98
TIME: 08:01
SUBJECT: Mail failure
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[002] Mail was received that was addressed to unknown addresses.
Mail item was not delivered to:
NRSYD/NRPSYD/joosseg

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------Internet Headers------------------
Received: from fw-pdc-int.nrc.com.au ([203.21.181.12]) by
viruswall.nrc.com.au (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT)
Received: from pine.iea-software.com by fw-pdc.nrc.com.au (8.6.14/200.19.1.1)
id HAA02349; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 07:26:08 +1000
Received: from sc2.rockliffe.com (unverified [204.147.233.1]) by
pine.iea-software.com
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 2.1.5) with ESMTP id <B0023627690@pine.iea-software.com>
for <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Tue, 09 Jun 1998 14:32:53 -0700
Received: from jgdn (unverified [204.147.233.10]) by sc2.rockliffe.com
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 2.1.6) with SMTP id <B0000129218@sc2.rockliffe.com> for
<ntisp@iea-software.com>
Tue, 09 Jun 1998 14:28:36 -0700
From: "John Davies" <jgd@rockliffe.com>
To: "Ntisp@Iea-Software. Com" <ntisp@iea-software.com>
Subject: RE: Postoffice 3.5 released
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 14:27:35 -0700
Message-ID: <003d01bd93ed$6ba54f50$0ae993cc@jgdn.rockliffe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Reply-To: ntisp@iea-software.com
Sender: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
----------------------------------------------------
Hi Eric,

You might want to look at moving to MailSite:
http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite.htm

We have many customers that have moved from Post.Office. We value our
customers
and offer very reasonable upgrades.

>The pricing is simply ridiculous. We like Post.Office 3.1.2 very much. But,
>at that sort of price, there is no way we are going to even consider
>upgrading. Most vendors give their customers free, or very low cost,
>upgrades within version types. Apparently Software.com doesn't think this
>way, and doesn't care about customer loyalty. This pricing structure will
>drive customers away in droves.
>
>
>On the other hand I must admit that the Postoffice E-Mail server works
>>flawlessly since we are using it. Rock solid never had a problem, but the
>>pricing strategy of software.com is becoming a problem for us.
>
>I'm in full agreement with you. It should have been a free upgrade for 3.x
>customers. Their pricing is leading us to IMail faster than Software.com
>would have ever believed.