The Only reason we went with a USR Total Control Chassis is because the "Extra
Features" we needed for accounting and setting up lines on a per accounting
basis.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas C Kinnen <tkinnen@usacomputers.net>
To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
Date: May 9, 1998 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Multi-link card
>>I have a total of 52 lines coming into NT RRAS servers authenticating from
>>RadiusNT with no problems, if you don't need the extra accounting and
>>features of devices like PM's. All our multiport cards are currently
>>Cyclades, we use some ISA and some PCI versions of their Y-series with
>>standard analog modems.
>
>
>If you don't mind me asking have you been pleased with the features and
>performance of RAS and what type of system are you running the lines off of?
>Most of my "encounters" with RAS have not been the most pleasant if going
>for any advanced features other then just straight dial in. Plus the over
>head an NT box vs. an access concentrator box like a PM has lead me to
>recommend customers away from RAS or Netware connect (On the novell side)
>for larger network access points. I'd like to get a someone's view point
>who uses RAS in larger the a dozen lines and is happy with it.
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>