At 03:27 PM 4/29/98 -0400, you wrote:
>I find it curious that you would prefer a seperate database for the ftp
>authentication when web site permissions etc.. are being handled by the NT
>SAM. What is your reasoning for wanting the user database to be apart from
>the SAM?
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Don Foret [mailto:dforet@ClearnetResources.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 3:11 PM
>> To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>> Subject: Re: FTP Service on IIS 4.0
>>
>>
>> IMHO Serv-U is a excellent. I've been running it for over a year with ZERO
>> problems. I also prefer the fact that authentication is
>> independent of the NT
>> user database. Tried several others and Serv-U is by far the
>> best, easiest to
>> use and administer, and almost free ($25).
>>
>> David Payer wrote:
>>
>> > I haven't moved to the latest from MS re:FTP servers but I did
>> look at the
>> > Serv-U page again and they now offer (via another author) a freeware web
>> > interface for your ftp users. Seems pretty neat to me.
>> >
>> > David Payer
>> >
>> > >MMC is REALLY cool, but it does have a big learning curve.... I hadn't
>> > >really realised that MS integrated their FTP with it so much
>> > >though...guess I'm going to have to go root through my server. :P
>> > >
>> > >Penny
>> > >
>> > >> Totally disagree here Penny... I think that with the
>> > >> integration offered by
>> > >> the <yuk> MMC you will be far better off in the long run
>> > >> figuring out the M$
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>> > NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>