RE: FTP Service on IIS 4.0

rkm ( rkm@marshall.net )
Wed, 29 Apr 1998 15:27:21 -0400

I find it curious that you would prefer a seperate database for the ftp
authentication when web site permissions etc.. are being handled by the NT
SAM. What is your reasoning for wanting the user database to be apart from
the SAM?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Foret [mailto:dforet@ClearnetResources.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 3:11 PM
> To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> Subject: Re: FTP Service on IIS 4.0
>
>
> IMHO Serv-U is a excellent. I've been running it for over a year with ZERO
> problems. I also prefer the fact that authentication is
> independent of the NT
> user database. Tried several others and Serv-U is by far the
> best, easiest to
> use and administer, and almost free ($25).
>
> David Payer wrote:
>
> > I haven't moved to the latest from MS re:FTP servers but I did
> look at the
> > Serv-U page again and they now offer (via another author) a freeware web
> > interface for your ftp users. Seems pretty neat to me.
> >
> > David Payer
> >
> > >MMC is REALLY cool, but it does have a big learning curve.... I hadn't
> > >really realised that MS integrated their FTP with it so much
> > >though...guess I'm going to have to go root through my server. :P
> > >
> > >Penny
> > >
> > >> Totally disagree here Penny... I think that with the
> > >> integration offered by
> > >> the <yuk> MMC you will be far better off in the long run
> > >> figuring out the M$
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>