For the most part, it doesn't matter. RadiusNT has very little
processor usage.
> **Note**
> --------
> I've got:
>
> 1. P2-266 w/4gb scsi + 256Ram ---> Proxy Server (RH Linux)
> 2. P2-266 w/4gb scsi + 128Ram ---> Email In/Out (RH Linux)
> 3. P2-266 w/4gb scsi + 128Ram ---> 1st RadiusNT + WWW + Cold Fusion +
> DNS1 (NT)
> 4. P2-266 w/4gb scsi + 128Ram ---> 2nd RadiusNT + SQL + Emerald + DNS2 (NT)
>
> Does the above look ok, or is it better to run the primary Radius Server on the
> same machine as the SQL(would there be a heavy traffic load between the primary
> Radius Server and the SQL server, or am I being a little too paranoid?)
The traffic is so little its irrelevant.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com