----------
> From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <daler@iea-software.com>
> To: RadiusNT@iea-software.com
> Subject: Re: I.Q. about RadiusNT 2.2
> Date: יום שלישי 07 אפריל 1998 00:25
>
> ori wrote:
> >
> > Hello Dale,
> > In my compant we are using RadiusNT 1.1 and find it difficult to go on
> > with. We are interested in buying RadiusNT 2.2.
> > From my experiance with the RadiusNT 1.1, The accuracy of the
accounting
> > feature fails to the mission (and I must add that this feature is very
> > important for us).
> > Another problem is the script which came with it - Detailer. It is very
> > unaccurate as well and too simple for relying on.
> >
> > To the point:
> > 1.Can I use it in ODBC mode with Access 97 reliably? Does it come with
the
> > database file Ready-made?
> > 2.Is there more sufisticated parser of the detail log file instead of
the
> > detailer?
> > 3.Is 2.2 more accurate then 1.1?
> > 4.Would it be wise to wait for the 2.5 ? when will it be published?
>
> Detailer is a product un-related to IEA Software.
>
> RadiusNT in ODBC mode is the most accurate way of doing usage
> based reporting. There is an Access 97 database that is
> included with RadiusNT and another avaialble from a customer
> that is more enhanced on our website.
>
> IEA Software does not write software to parse RadiusNT logs.
> We only support use of a database (which in base defintion
> stored, parses and processes data). No need to re-invent the
> wheel. :)
>
> --
> Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
> _________________________________________________________________
> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> RadiusNT Mailing List lists@iea-software.com