Re: RadiusNT and Calls Table

Dale E. Reed Jr. ( (no email) )
Thu, 11 Dec 1997 23:13:49 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Dale E. Reed Jr.: "Re: RadiusNT and Calls Table"
Next message: Patrick Nehls: "Differanciating analog + digital users"
Maybe in reply to: Mitch Wagers: "RadiusNT and Calls Table"
Next in thread: Mitch Wagers: "Re: RadiusNT and Calls Table"

Mitch Wagers wrote:
>
> Yes, actually, I have duplicated SessionID's for different customers, but
> they are for different ports, never a SessionID duplicated that matches a
> duplicated port.
> make sense? it's kinda confusing....

Some of the legacy equipment actually did that, and thats why
NASPort is in the Key. It shouldn't be, as the RFC says that every
session should have a unique key. The only situation where this MAY
come into play is MPP, where they bring up a second channel for the
same session.

-- Dale E. Reed Jr.  (daler@iea.com)_________________________________________________________________       IEA Software, Inc.      |  RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today  |   http://www.iea-software.com

Previous message: Dale E. Reed Jr.: "Re: RadiusNT and Calls Table"
Next message: Patrick Nehls: "Differanciating analog + digital users"
Maybe in reply to: Mitch Wagers: "RadiusNT and Calls Table"
Next in thread: Mitch Wagers: "Re: RadiusNT and Calls Table"