> You are correct that this is v1.0 for USR. Unfortunately from what I hear
>(called on your behalf to the senior product manager for Netserver) that
>box, for technical reasons, (mostly financial I bet, since Lucent is
>wanting $$$ for the Livingston royalties, since Livingston and USR had
>their spat) will not run the older generation code.
YIKES! I had not heard that it WILL NOT run the older USR code. I just know
they don't ship it with it. You are saying that the old code will not work
in it if I happen to have a copy of it from an older Netserver I have?
> Do you have maintenance on this box? If so call in and ask for the ER
>release of the latest code dealing with the issue.
My 90 days from purchase is about up. I do not have any maintenance contract
with them The least expensive one offered when I called sales recently is
$1495.00 per year. (almost 1/3 the cost of the box itself). I consider this
a bit high if you only have one or two boxes. I would pay $200 for an annual
contract for a box but not $1495.00.
NTISP Mailing List email@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822.TXT"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="RFC822.TXT"
Received: from netpmsa.cnet.navy.mil by pens3646.cnet.navy.mil (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.00.01)
; Fri, 03 Apr 98 11:27:15 -0600
Received: from twister.iea.com by netpmsa.cnet.navy.mil with SMTP
(126.96.36.199/16.2) id AA24040; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 11:20:22 -0600
Received: from ia-omni.com by twister.emerald.iea.com (NTList 3.02.13) id pa249251; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:10:01 -0800
X-Routed: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 11:11:50 -0500
Received: from david.ia-omni.com [188.8.131.52] by ia-omni.ia-omni.com with smtp
id ALALAOBM ; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 11:11:14 -0500
From: "David Payer" <david.payer@IA-OMNI.COM>
Subject: Re: USR Netservers and packet loss
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 11:21:39 -0600
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
X-Listmember: firstname.lastname@example.org [email@example.com]