At 08:25 PM 3/24/98 -0800, you wrote:
>We have done some testing here, and if we go over 825 sites the service
fails to start. Has anyone else seen this?
>
>Thanks,
>Matthew
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Fisher [SMTP:bill@excelsoft.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 3:09 PM
>To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>Subject: Re: IIS 4.0 & Shared IP addresses
>
>Do you know of any performance issues with this? My initial guess is
>that it may be better since the server doesn't have to keep track of so
>many IP's?
>
>Bill
>
>----------
>> From: Michael J. Gibbs <mgibbs@fia.net>
>> To: 'ntisp@emerald.iea.com'
>> Subject: RE: IIS 4.0 & Shared IP addresses
>> Date: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 2:47 PM
>>
>> Host Header Support (a feature of http v1.1) is required on browsers
>for
>> this to work properly. This translates to 2.x or better of Netscape
>and 3.x
>> or better of Microsoft.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bill Fisher [SMTP:bill@excelsoft.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 2:46 PM
>> To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>> Subject: IIS 4.0 & Shared IP addresses
>>
>> We are getting close to switching most of our hosting to a IIS 4.0
>> machine (from IIS 3.0) and I want to use the shared IP address
>feature
>> to conserve about 50 IPs. Does anyone know of any drawbacks?
>>
>> I suspect that I will not be sharing people that have FrontPage on
>> their site and possibly a few other clients. But is there a big
>reason
>> to go one way besides marketing's idea of domain hosting and
>"Virtual"
>
>
>> domain hosting?
>>
>>
>> Thanks for you input.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Fisher
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>