Re: Cold Fusion or ASP

Mitchell B. Wagers ( (no email) )
Wed, 18 Feb 1998 13:32:36 -0800

I'll agree that Cold Fusion has some added ability, but this could be done
with making DLL's for ASP. The only gripe I have with Cold Fusion it is
*SLOW* and doesn't seem to have much of a followed standard, such as the
tags and the way they are used.

At 04:23 PM 2/18/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I'll second that!
>
>Kurt A. Butzin, DDS Molarnet Technologies, Inc
>President 1936 Bay Street
>kurt@molar.net Saginaw, MI 48602
>http://www.molar.net
>
>Authorized iPSwitch WebVar (http://www.molar.net/ipswitch/index.html)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dale E. Reed Jr. <daler@iea-software.com>
>To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com <ntisp@emerald.iea.com>
>Date: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 9:36 AM
>Subject: Re: Cold Fusion or ASP
>
>
>>On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Christian Schmit wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone have experiences working with
>>> Cold Fusion from http://www.allaire.com?
>>>
>>> For the moment we implement our Web Databases
>>> using the ASP pages provided with IIS4.
>>>
>>> I am now interested if Cold Fusion offers advantages
>>> over ASP for developing Web Database applications on NT?
>>>
>>> Can anybody recommand using Cold Fusion over ASP?
>>
>>I personally have never used ASP, but have very in-depth
>>working knowledge of Cold Fusion and use it frequently for
>>web <-> database interaction. Its very solid, powerful and
>>a must for anyone integrated a database to a web page.
>>
>>Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
>>_________________________________________________________________
>> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
>> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>