At 08:45 PM 1/8/98 -0600, you wrote:
>Ms DNS is very slow compared to the NT port of unix DNS, and A LOT more
stable
>we over 305+ domains running on it.
>
>Carlo Gibertini wrote:
>
>> We use Ms as second with 96 domains.
>>
>> Abra=E7os,
>>
>> Carlo
>>
>> ----------
>> > De: Jeff Binkley <jeff.binkley@asacomp.com>
>> > Para: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>> > Assunto: RE: Microsoft DNS vs others
>> > Data: Quinta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 1998 17:05
>> >
>> >
>> > Ok, I'll play this silly game. We use Microsoft's DNS and it works
>> great.
>> > It is a secondary controller for 20+ domains. We use a Unix primary,=
not
>> > because we have problems with NT, we just had it first. We point most=
of
>> > our users at the NT box thought for lookups.
>> >
>> > Jeff Binkley
>> > ASA Network Computing
>> >
>> >
>> > -> Hi,
>> > ->
>> > -> We used MS DNS and it is crap! Now we use BIND for NT
>> > -> from software.com which runs without problems.
>> > ->
>> > -> Christian
>> > ->
>> > -> At 11:41 AM 1/8/98 -0600, you wrote:
>> > -> >MetaInfo's DNS servers are pretty solid, and extremely easy to
>> >administer.
>> > -> We've been using them in production for about 4 months >without any
>> > -> problems.
>> > -> >
>> > -> >
>> > -> >Mike Topalovich
>> > -> >TGI Network Services
>> > -> >
>> > -> >
>> > -> > -----Original Message-----
>> > -> > From: Kelly Wright [SMTP:kwright@buz.net]
>> > -> > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 1998 11:18 AM
>> > -> > To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>> > NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>> >
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>
>