Re: Microsoft DNS vs others

Lawrence Watkins ( lwatkins@thepark.net )
Thu, 08 Jan 1998 20:45:35 -0600

Ms DNS is very slow compared to the NT port of unix DNS, and A LOT more stable
we over 305+ domains running on it.

Carlo Gibertini wrote:

> We use Ms as second with 96 domains.
>
> Abrašos,
>
> Carlo
>
> ----------
> > De: Jeff Binkley <jeff.binkley@asacomp.com>
> > Para: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> > Assunto: RE: Microsoft DNS vs others
> > Data: Quinta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 1998 17:05
> >
> >
> > Ok, I'll play this silly game. We use Microsoft's DNS and it works
> great.
> > It is a secondary controller for 20+ domains. We use a Unix primary, not
> > because we have problems with NT, we just had it first. We point most of
> > our users at the NT box thought for lookups.
> >
> > Jeff Binkley
> > ASA Network Computing
> >
> >
> > -> Hi,
> > ->
> > -> We used MS DNS and it is crap! Now we use BIND for NT
> > -> from software.com which runs without problems.
> > ->
> > -> Christian
> > ->
> > -> At 11:41 AM 1/8/98 -0600, you wrote:
> > -> >MetaInfo's DNS servers are pretty solid, and extremely easy to
> >administer.
> > -> We've been using them in production for about 4 months >without any
> > -> problems.
> > -> >
> > -> >
> > -> >Mike Topalovich
> > -> >TGI Network Services
> > -> >
> > -> >
> > -> > -----Original Message-----
> > -> > From: Kelly Wright [SMTP:kwright@buz.net]
> > -> > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 1998 11:18 AM
> > -> > To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com