Re: Microsoft DNS vs others

Carlo Gibertini ( (no email) )
Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:42:53 -0200

We use Ms as second with 96 domains.

Abrašos,

Carlo

----------
> De: Jeff Binkley <jeff.binkley@asacomp.com>
> Para: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
> Assunto: RE: Microsoft DNS vs others
> Data: Quinta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 1998 17:05
>
>
> Ok, I'll play this silly game. We use Microsoft's DNS and it works
great.
> It is a secondary controller for 20+ domains. We use a Unix primary, not
> because we have problems with NT, we just had it first. We point most of
> our users at the NT box thought for lookups.
>
> Jeff Binkley
> ASA Network Computing
>
>
> -> Hi,
> ->
> -> We used MS DNS and it is crap! Now we use BIND for NT
> -> from software.com which runs without problems.
> ->
> -> Christian
> ->
> -> At 11:41 AM 1/8/98 -0600, you wrote:
> -> >MetaInfo's DNS servers are pretty solid, and extremely easy to
>administer.
> -> We've been using them in production for about 4 months >without any
> -> problems.
> -> >
> -> >
> -> >Mike Topalovich
> -> >TGI Network Services
> -> >
> -> >
> -> > -----Original Message-----
> -> > From: Kelly Wright [SMTP:kwright@buz.net]
> -> > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 1998 11:18 AM
> -> > To: ntisp@emerald.iea.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> NTISP Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
>