----------
> From: Peter A. Sang <pesa@sang.de>
> To: 'RadiusNT@emerald.iea.com'
> Subject: RE: New equipment.
> Date: Friday, April 18, 1997 11:20 AM
>
> Hi Mitch,
>
> great idea! (I agree it's a little bit offtopic)
>
> Does anybody know a good list where we can dig into ISP- & DSP technical
> details <DG> ?
>
> REM: my company originates from parallel computing and DSP products,
> still _love_ this stuff: I'm always prepared for an in-depth discussion
> .....going from MB's to bytes, nibbles and even DSP-microcode ;)
>
> cu, Peter
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Mitch Wagers [SMTP:wizard@telcentral.net]
> >Sent: Friday, April 18, 1997 5:04 PM
> >To: RadiusNT@emerald.iea.com
> >Subject: Re: New equipment.
> >
> >Thanks Peter! You are correct about the USR and PM3's and I apologize
for
> >myself. It is still argued that a DSP chip must convert the signal
> >however, but with much less reduction in quality. Both of us are
correct,
> >yet there are still details that cannot be removed. However, the
caller's
> >modem is digitally muxed to a T1 if it is run to a com server like a
5200.
> >I think, however, this conversation will be taken to a newer list seeing
> >that it has to do with ISP Technology, and not RadiusNT. I'm more than
> >happy to be available for discussion and to work out the "myths" about
this
> >stuff, but not on this list any longer. I believe even the Big Boys
> >(laugh) learned a couple things.
> >Telco's can tell you one thing, but this stuff is rarely noted for
people
> >to learn :) Always remember that a telco is a telephone company.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Mitch
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > RadiusNT Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> RadiusNT Mailing List listserver@emerald.iea.com