RE: New equipment.

Mitch Wagers ( )
Fri, 18 Apr 1997 14:21:28 -0500

The idea for the list to discuss this subject is in the works.

At 08:20 PM 4/18/97 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi Mitch,
>great idea! (I agree it's a little bit offtopic)
>Does anybody know a good list where we can dig into ISP- & DSP technical
>details <DG> ?
>REM: my company originates from parallel computing and DSP products,
>still _love_ this stuff: I'm always prepared for an in-depth discussion
>.....going from MB's to bytes, nibbles and even DSP-microcode ;)
>cu, Peter
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mitch Wagers []
>>Sent: Friday, April 18, 1997 5:04 PM
>>Subject: Re: New equipment.
>>Thanks Peter! You are correct about the USR and PM3's and I apologize for
>>myself. It is still argued that a DSP chip must convert the signal
>>however, but with much less reduction in quality. Both of us are correct,
>>yet there are still details that cannot be removed. However, the caller's
>>modem is digitally muxed to a T1 if it is run to a com server like a 5200.
>>I think, however, this conversation will be taken to a newer list seeing
>>that it has to do with ISP Technology, and not RadiusNT. I'm more than
>>happy to be available for discussion and to work out the "myths" about this
>>stuff, but not on this list any longer. I believe even the Big Boys
>>(laugh) learned a couple things.
>>Telco's can tell you one thing, but this stuff is rarely noted for people
>>to learn :) Always remember that a telco is a telephone company.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> RadiusNT Mailing List
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> RadiusNT Mailing List