Jeff Woods wrote:
>
> Aiieeee! Single drives for news are NOT recommended. If your NNS is
> properly configured, go into performance manager, and see how disk bound
> you are. You're probably losing lots of articles for inability to keep up.
> You need to be inserting about 3-5 articles a second for that many groups.
>
> We have 10 2.9 GB SCSI drives in a RAID-5 mirror.... 2 RAID arrays of 5
> drives each, spanned. We could lose two drives (but not more than one from
> each 5-drive chain) and still be operable. And with ten spindles to share
> the data accesses, over two SCSI channels, it smokes.
>
> Single drive news solutions are horribly inefficient. Even if you only use
> striping in NT Server instead of hardware RAID, you should get more than
> one drive handling that data. Use RAID-5, which is better for lots of
> small files, whereas RAID-3 is better for large files and throughput.
>