Re: CallsOnline and tempdb
David Edwards ( Gecker@Oakweb.com )
Sat, 12 Apr 1997 01:39:09 -0700
At 11:18 AM 4/12/97 +1000, you wrote:
>>> Just on the tempdb thing, I went to our SQL server today to try and
>>> size of the tempdb database. First went to expand the master device
>>> found that it's maximum size was a negative number!! And the listed
>>> the device was the same as the maximum size. Of course, this makes it
>>> slightly hard to expand the master device. The funny thing was that this
>>> was the same on all the devices except for the EmeraldDev device.
>>> Maybey the SQL server wants all the devices as contiguous files on the
>>> disk !?!?
>>> If anyone has seen this before, I'd appreciate a hint on how to
>>I have seen it before. Open up isql_w and execute:
>>as well as any other DBs having problems like this. Typically it will
>>fix the problem. DBCC has a lot of good options for correcting problems.
> Thanks for the hint, Dale. Didn't work though. Databases seem to be OK,
>it's only the size of the database devices that seems to be negative. I
>think it might be a bug in the Enterprise Manager. We're running 6.5
>without any service packs.
> In any case, doing a disk resize via isql_w seemed to do the trick. E.g
> NAME = 'test',
> SIZE = 16384
> The Enterprise Manager still reports the size as a negative number (when
>you edit the device), but shows the true size in the graph, and also when
>you select "Manage->Database Devices" from the menu.
Here is what Microsoft says about it...
Why does SQL Enterprise Manager (SEM) sometimes show a negative number for
the size of a device?
This problem occurs if the device being edited is on a drive
that has more than 2 gigabytes of free space. When
this problem occurs, the size of the device cannot be changed
in the dialog box.
To work around this problem, use the DISK RESIZE command to
manually increase the size of the device.
Does that answer your question?
System Administrator - Oakweb.com
Lake Tahoe's Premier Internet Service Provider