>Actually, its IS being saved. Its just not being retrieved from
>the Database correctly. There is always 2.0.75 that does display
>it correctly. :)
>I'll see about fixing it...
Dale, thanks very much. (Please see my apology in the message just before
this -- I've been quite curt with you lately, and you don't deserve it).
Can you followup, please, on why we get a CANNOT LOAD DLL when trying to
upgrade beyond 2.0.88? It doesn't say WHICH .DLL it cannot load, just an
ERROR 48, I think.