RE: [NTISP] CACHING DEVIC

Jeff Binkley ( jeff.binkley@asacomp.com )
Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:15:12 -0500

How hard is it to setup a Cisco router to do transparent caching ? I am
assuming you are using WCCP and the Squid box has two NICs in it with
two different addresses ?

Jeff Binkley
ASA Network Computing

N>Another bonus with a Transparent Caching server is the fact that those
N>= Advertising firms (doubleclick.com) can NOT get much information
N>about = you. Or practically can't get anything from your clients.
N>That is also = a bit encouraging for ISPs who want to show a bit of
N>security to the = client.

N>-----Original Message-----
N>From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
N>[mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of Chazakis Ioannis
N>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 7:31 AM
N>To: ntisp@iea-software.com
N>Subject: RE: [NTISP] Caching devices good? bad? Help

N>We have been using squid and set our cisco routers to do transparent =
N>caching
N>for some time now.. Works like a charm.
N>Cidera looks very good, infact we are expecting their technician to =
N>install
N>the dish and adapter. Apart from the large customer base, its also got
N>a 45Mbps downlink to each dish, so its pretty fast too.

N>-----Original Message-----
N>From: ntisp-request@iea-software.com
N>[mailto:ntisp-request@iea-software.com]On Behalf Of Peter Deacon
N>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 1:45 AM
N>To: ntisp@iea-software.com
N>Subject: Re: [NTISP] Caching devices good? bad? Help

N>On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, JM Foster wrote:

N>> We used a cache server from Cobalt Networks.
N>> Personally I don't think caching is a viable solution
N>> on the mid to small level ISP because the community is not large
N>> enough to have a decent cache. I spoke to Cidera.com, they use a =
N>global
N>> community of 8.5 million customers to create their cache.
N>> This is what we are going to move to.

N>There's something about caches that seem faster even if only one
N>person = is
N>using it and the data your requesting is not in the cache -- over
N>dialup anyway (but it might be my imagination:) I think it has
N>something to do with tcp chat latency being absorbed by the cache
N>buffering data = locally.

N>Have Fun!
N>Peter

N>For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
N>http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart

N>For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
N>http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart

N>For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
N>http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart

CMPQwk 1.42 9999

For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart