Thanks
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/24/00, at 3:49 PM, Dale E. Reed Jr. wrote:
>PowerNet wrote:
>>
>> Why did Emerald try to bill 196 services in 2.5.322+ when in 300 it only=
should be invoicing about 20 services?
>>
>> "Its sorta covered here:
>> v2.5.313 - 11/3/99
>>
>> * The batch criteria was checking the maExpireDate rather than the
>> billed thru date to determine customers that needed to be billed
>> for certain autobatch processed."
>>
>> We are using a manual list we check every day against the Emerald batch=
to make sure they match. It is correct with the 300 invoiced services but=
the 196 that v322+ wants to creat blows us away.
>>
>> Is there an SQL query I can run to get me the detail of what the 322+=
(196 invoices) batch was doing so I can print it out and look at it before=
we create all these invoices and then have to go back and delete them if=
they are wrong?
>
>What the note in changes.txt means is, that for those customers with
>a blank/null expire date, 2.5.300 would not bill them. A blank
>expire date typically means Balance forward, and you want the customer
>to get another bill (unlike renewal), even if they don't pay their
>last one (since thier account still works, if they don't have an
>expire date).
>
>Check to see what customers you have with a blank expire date. Those
>are probably the ones you are missing.
>
>--
>
>Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT
>__________________________________________
>IEA Software, Inc. www.iea-software.com
>
>For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
>http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart
For more information about this list (including removal) go to:
http://www.iea-software.com/support/maillists/liststart