From: "Ronnie Franklin" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: [Emerald] Error while processing a custom search Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:48:34 -0500 Message-ID: <email@example.com>
Just a note on my system..
I have though several times that I needed to upgrade my Radius servers,
but all I have done is replaced the hard drives as a pro-active measure.
I am running two old Pentium I 200mhz computers for Radius.
I have about 800 lines, 14 Wireless Access points and DSL that all
authenicate via those two old 200mhz, 128megs of Ram and they have never
reset or needed to be reset in about 4 years.
I have Cisco AS5300s, AS5800, Redback and used to run Livingston PM2Es.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Nada
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:34 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: [Emerald] Error while processing a custom search
> Hello Dale,
> Thank you for the support. I have though a problem with my
> radius servers
> which sometimes stop to respond and block the authentication.
> We need to
> restart it so the activity is back to normal.
> The setup we have is as follows:
> We are running radius version 4.0.28. We have 5 radius
> machines, on the
> same LAN with the database server. We have around 3100 phone line
> distributed on 36 heterogeneous access servers (we have
> cisco, livingston,
> ascend, tigris).
> What is the proper dimensioning of this network? What are the
> needed radius
> machines in terms of memory, operating system, configuration,
> cpu ... ?
> Can we arrive to a situation where we have only 2 Radius
> machines instead
> of 5 ? this will avoid us duplicating machine to load balance
> the access
> servers and leads to minimize the maintenance on these machines.
> What is the recommended configuration (one radius backing up
> the others, or
> a circular reference) does it integrate well with Emerald ?
> We need to find the best solution for us in order to stop the
> authentication failure.
> Waiting for your comments,
> Nada Syriani,
> IDM sal.
> At 11:32 AM 10/9/2003 -0700, Dale Reed wrote:
> >This issue along with the double search results for
> non-admin users was
> >resolved in Emerald 4.5.5. You can download Emerald 4.5.5 from the
> >download center on our website:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: email@example.com
> >[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Nada
> >Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:50 AM
> >To: email@example.com
> >Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> >Subject: [Emerald] Error while processing a custom search
> >We have just installed the new version of Emerald 4.5.4. When we
> >perform a custom search from the user which is not an admin
> user we get
> >the below error. Please check and reply to us how can we solve it.
> >Thank you for the support,
> >Nada Syriani
> >IDM sal.
> >+++ error +++
> >[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Ambiguous column name
> >SELECT CASE WHEN ma.Active = 0 THEN 'inactive.gif' WHEN
> >IS NOT NULL THEN 'canceled.gif' ELSE 'normal.gif' END AS status,
> >ma.FirstName, ma.LastName, Company, adt.Description as
> Login, ad.Data
> >as AccountType, ma.CustomerID FROM MasterAccounts ma,
> >ad, MasterAccountDataTypes adt , MetaTables mt, Objects o,
> >OperatorGroupAccess oga WHERE ma.CustomerID = ad.CustomerID AND
> >ad.DataTypeID = adt.DataTypeID AND ad.DataTypeID = 1 AND Data LIKE
> >'%DM320%' AND mt.MetaTableID = o.Value AND o.ObjectTypeID = 2 AND
> >mt.TableName = 'MasterAccounts' AND oga.OperatorGroupID = 3 AND
> >oga.ObjectGroupID = o.ObjectGroupID AND oga.AccessType & 1 = 1 AND
> >oga.GroupID IN (ma.GroupID,1)