Re: [RadiusNT] Unable to get 2.5_160 to work

Juergen Weiss ( (no email) )
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 21:29:10 +0100

I am using your sample radius972.mdb (the extended one). This one has a
Licenses table but field LiscenceID. So I just had to rename the table.

Dale, as I downloaded this from your ftp-site, I assume you do have a third
version (Licenses with LiscenseID). Maybe nobody else uses this sample, but
as I am starting right now I am just a little bit playing around.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dale E. Reed Jr. <>
An: <>
Datum: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 1999 19:58
Betreff: Re: [RadiusNT] Unable to get 2.5_160 to work

>Juergen Weiss wrote:
>> After downloading the patch I still had problems. Seems there is a typo
>> the sql-statements:
>> Select DISTINCT Company, LicenseID From Licenses
>> Select DISTINCT Company, LiscenseID From Liscenses
>> I changed the table name from Licenses to Liscenses and now it works. But
>> why can I see these two statements?
>RadiusNT will look to see if either the Licenses or Liscenses table
>exists. ONE of the two MUST exist, regardless if it it empty or not.
>I just tried an MS Access database first with a Liscenses table
>and secondly with a Licenses table, and it worked with either one.
>The ID field MUST match name spelling of the table name, as
>seen in the display. Therefore if you had a Licenses tables
>with a LiscenseID field, that combination would not work. Did
>you rename the field as well when you renamed the table?
>Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT
>IEA Software, Inc.
>For more information about this list, including removal, please
>see this URL:

For more information about this list, including removal, please
see this URL: