Re: [RadiusNT] Radius 2.5.160

Dale E. Reed Jr. ( (no email) )
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:06:46 -0800

Frank Nowling wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that 2.5.160 seems to take slightly less processor
> time than 2.5.124? I'm not complaining, but the changes.txt file didn't
> mention any improvements in processor usage.

If it does, I wouldn't know why (and thats why there is not mention
of it in the changes.txt). We did make some stability enhacements
on it, which migh account for the less processor time.


Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT__________________________________________IEA Software, Inc.

For more information about this list, including removal, pleasesee this URL: