Re: [RadiusNT] Problems

Darren Bacon ( (no email) )
Sat, 12 Dec 1998 14:02:18 +1100

>Lousy? Feel free to comment on areas that *YOU* would like to see
>expanded. Unless *YOU* suggest areas of improvement, we don't
>know what areas are "lousy". The latest RadiusNT 2.5 docs are fairly
>in depth and answers 90% of the questions most people ask.

The list of tables in the documentation is missing a number of fields that
the installation process installs, there are also tables missing. There are
no descriptions on the relationships between the tables.

There is a probelem that has only just been acknowledged about the Time
Banking, maybe this could be in the documentation. Perhaps included as a
readme with the distribution.

Cisco configuration has been excluded from examples. Very frustrating when
configuring them is so easy "when you know how".

Adding fields to pick up extra logging information is a nice feature, it is
spoiled by the fact there is no reference about what type of field (int,
char, etc) should be installed in the database to pick up the information.

The documentation online is v2.2, not much good for 2.5 users.

We would like to log call details to a seperate database, I would have
assumed we could just duplicate the schema into an empty database and start
logging to it, unfortunately this appears to not be the case and we have to
replicate the entire database?

How many more known bugs are around that are not documented for us to see?

I'm sorry if I have offended people, I didn't realise that trying to extract
information about a product we've bought was such a touchy subject.

For more information about this list, including removal, please
see this URL: