Re: [RadiusNT] Problems

Terry Bomersbach ( (no email) )
Fri, 11 Dec 1998 19:22:05 -0600

I would recommend that when someone posts a question, take it for what it
is. They don't know either, so they are asking. Let Dale answer the
question, he seems to have the best qualifications and usually his answers
provide great clarification.

Or at least wait for some clarification. I believe the question was asking
what tables were needed on each SQL server one for authentication and one
for accounting.

-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Bacon <>
To: <>
Date: Friday, December 11, 1998 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [RadiusNT] Problems

>>> I saw on the RadiusNT admin that has a option to "USE DIFFERENT
>>> ACCOUNTING DSN". I would like to know which tables are necessary to put
>>To use that feature RadiusNT assumes the database is replicated to the
>>authentication ODBC DSN. We are in the process of re-working the logic
>That is a bit of a half-assed answer, can you explain it further please?
>We've just spent three months organising our 15,000 user database, two SQL
>servers and six authentication servers ready for a cutover to RadiusNT in
>March. We're about to start work on handling the Call details. Are you
>saying that we cannot use a different database to log the call details? I
>don't understand.
>For more information about this list, including removal, please
>see this URL:

For more information about this list, including removal, please
see this URL: