Re: [Emerald] increasing table size
Dale E. Reed Jr. ( (no email) )
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 11:18:25 -0500
Rick Richardson wrote:
> We're using the desc in groups to store more info about the groups
> to be used later, but it isn't large enough at 45.. would there be any
> harm in
> stretching that to say, 60?
I don't think the group description is used, so that shouldn't
cause a problem.
Dale E. Reed Jr. Emerald and RadiusNT__________________________________________IEA Software, Inc. www.iea-software.com