User not known
Your message reads (in part):
Received: from walnut.iea-software.com (unverified [207.53.165.8]) by webserver.netsis.it
(EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id <B0000166841@webserver.netsis.it>
Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:58:42 +0200
Received: from walnut.iea-software.com (walnut.iea-software.com [207.53.165.8]) by walnut.iea-software.com (NTMail 4.00.0020/NT6651.00.c89adb95) with ESMTP id za000434 for <emerald@iea-software.com> Thu, 10 Sep 1998 01:38:37 +0100
Received: from [208.224.184.253] by walnut.iea-software.com (NTMail 4.00.0020/NT6651.00.c89adb95) with ESMTP id mjeaaaaa for <emerald@iea-software.com> Thu, 10 Sep 1998 01:38:37 +0100
Received: from zamnet.zm ([208.224.184.180]) by ngoshe.zamnet.zm
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-49706U5000L500S0V35)
with ESMTP id zm; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:42:35 +0200
Message-ID: <35F79107.76CCAE86@zamnet.zm>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:42:47 +0200
From: amwansa@zamnet.zm (Annabel Mwansa)
Reply-To: amwansa@pop3.zamnet.zm
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "\"Robert H. Clugston\"" <robert@csnsys.com>,
emerald@iea-software.com
CC: amwansa@pop3.zamnet.zm
Subject: Re: Online Calls
References: <002601bddc1f$2678f4c0$10bb53ce@xanadu.csnsys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ListMember: filippo@netsis.it [emerald@iea-software.com]
Thanks. The users do have access to the triggers. The calls online is still not being updated.
Robert H. Clugston wrote:
> Dear Annabel,
> That isn't supposed to stay there. After you press the report button it
> should create a field under the Server Ports Tab. If you have some server
> ports under the server ports tab make sure your users have access to the SQL
> triggers. You do this by going into SQL Executive and going to databases,
> permissions, then give those users access to the triggers. One way to make
> sure this is the problem is to log in as SA (In Emerald.) This user should
> have complete permissions.
>
> robert@comstocknet.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Annabel Mwansa [mailto:amwansa@zamnet.zm]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 1998 10:34 AM
> To: Robert H. Clugston
> Cc: amwansa@pop3.zamnet.zm
> Subject: Re: Online Calls
>
> I set the type to the best match and report-ed. I discovered that when I
> leave the
> Server tab and come back to it, the type is not there anymore. I did save
> the
> change...
>
> Robert H. Clugston wrote:
>
> > I think you have to go into Emerald Administrator, Change Radius,
> Server,
> > then click on your terminal server, and where is say type put in Accend
> TNT
> > 4000 (or whatever matchs the best.) and click the report button.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Annabel Mwansa [mailto:amwansa@zamnet.zm]
> > Sent: Friday, September 04, 1998 5:05 AM
> > To: emerald@iea-software.com
> > Subject: Re: Online Calls
> >
> > Calls Online are not showing up. Any ideas?
> >
> > Annabel Mwansa
> >
> > Richard Sensale wrote:
> >
> > > A few times
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg Dobinson <gregd@kenora.com>
> > > To: emerald@iea-software.com <emerald@iea-software.com>
> > > Date: Thursday, August 27, 1998 11:12 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Online Calls
> > >
> > > >Have you tried doing a server Re-Port in the emerald administrator?
> > > >
> > > >----------------------------------------------------------
> > > >Greg Dobinson, MCSE
> > > >TechNet of Kenora
> > > >Kenora, Ontario Canada
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >gregd@kenora.com
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Richard Sensale <richards@visitus.net>
> > > >To: emerald@iea-software.com <emerald@iea-software.com>
> > > >Date: Thursday, August 27, 1998 3:02 PM
> > > >Subject: Online Calls
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Hi
> > > >>
> > > >>Im still unable to bring up the online calls in Emerald. I checked
> our
> > > Max
> > > >>and accounting and auth appear to be set up according to the
> > requirements
> > > >in
> > > >>the radiusNT manual. What else needs to be done, checked, set up etc.
> > It
> > > >>was working before our OS upgrade to the ascend. I have the ports at
> > 1645
> > > >>and 1646 respectively but it still isn't working.
> > > >>
> > > >