Message 2: Re: licence problem solved
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 3: Re: This is so cool
from "Justin Thomas" <justint@stellarcom.com>
Message 4: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
from Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
Message 5: Re: This is so cool
from Pietro Bisignano <bisignano@imd.it>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 1 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: licence problem solved
From: "Mohammed Ersan" <ersan@first.net.jo>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 09:28:54 +0300
I mean regarding the two tables.....(liscenses and licenses) what's the difference
At 11:22 PM 06/13/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Mohammed Ersan wrote:
>>
>> We have a liscense for 1000 MBRs and in my database there are the
>> "liscenses" table only so whats the diff. between liscenses and licenses
>
>An s? :) I am not sure what you are asking.
>--
>Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
>_________________________________________________________________
> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
>
<center>Mohammed Ersan
ersan@first.net.jo
firstnet
</center>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 2 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: licence problem solved
From: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 17:09:27 -0700
Mohammed Ersan wrote:
>
> I mean regarding the two tables.....(liscenses and licenses) what's the difference
The answer is still: an "s". :) Emerald 2.5 and RadiusNT 2.5 will look first
for licenses, and then for liscenses. 3.0 will remove the support for
liscenses.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 3 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: This is so coolFrom: "Justin Thomas" <justint@stellarcom.com>Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 19:00:03 -0600
Has anyone used this and if so, what did you think of it?
-----Original Message-----From: Greg Lowthian <greg@isat.com>To: radiusnt@iea-software.com <radiusnt@iea-software.com>Date: Friday, June 12, 1998 2:13 PMSubject: This is so cool
>I just had to put this on the list.>For those of you that want to control your systems remotely this>is it.>http://www.orl.co.uk/vnc/index.html>It works like Remotely Possible but it will work from a browser>with Java also.>The best part is its "FREE">>> iSAT/NT&C> Internet Services and Training> Greg Lowthian greg@isat.com> Operations Manager> 619-574-4832 www.isat.com>> Network Training and Consulting> Novell CNE certification classes> 619-679-2143 www.nt-c.com>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 4 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer PlusFrom: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 22:12:01 -0300
Chris Thomas wrote:> > Have you checked the output from running RadiusNT in debug mode. We found> that the Netserver Plus was sending a larger than normal session ID, and as> a result, the field wasn't large enough and the record was rejected.> Checkout the debug errors and see if this is your problem.>
That's it ! but now another question:
How much can I increase the size of AcctSessionId field in the calls table Dale ?
> Chris Thomas> Westnet Internet Services> > > -----Original Message-----> > From: Einstein Oliveira [mailto:einstein@yawl.com.br]> > Sent: Sunday, 14 June 1998 10:03> > To: radiusnt@iea-software.com> > Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus> >> >> > Tim Pitman wrote:> > >> > > The old and new netserver will accept 255.255.255.254 to> > assign an IP> > > address from the pool.> >> > This solved the connection problem but I still have problems> > with accounting.> > Here is a syslog message from NS Plus:> >> > Jun 13 20:03:45 nsplus At 20:02:07, Facility "User Manager",> > Level "CRITICAL"::> > AUTH: No acknowledgement from RADIUS accounting servers,> > reached max number of> > timeouts> >> >> > I'm using the same RadiusNT Server for Authentication and Accounting.> >> > >> > > -----Original Message-----> > > From: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>> > > To: radiusnt@iea-software.com <radiusnt@iea-software.com>> > > Date: Saturday, June 13, 1998 9:07 AM> > > Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus> > >> > > >Dale E. Reed Jr. wrote:> > > >>> > > >> Einstein Oliveira wrote:> > > >> >> > > >> > Hi,> > > >> >> > > >> > I don't think that this is a problem with> > RadiusNT but maybe> > > this happened with> > > >> > someone in this list.> > > >> >> > > >> > Actually we have a few USR NetServer 16 V.34> > working with> > > Radius 2.2.41 and> > > >> > everything is fine with IP's being automatically> > assigned by the> > > NetServer.> > > >> >> > > >> > Now we're trying to put a USR NetServer Plus> > V.34 to work with> > > these guys but> > > >> > there are some problems that I can't figure out why> > they are happening.> > > >> >> > > >> > When I connect through NetServer Plus the call> > is authenticated> > > only if the> > > >> > Framed-Addres attribute is set in the RadConfigs to> > the account; If not> > > (wich> > > >> > has been working perfectly with old NetServers) the> > connection is> > > dropped and in> > > >> > both cases no account records are generated in the calls table.> > > >>> > > >> Could it be that you don't have an address pool> > configured on the NS> > > Plus?> > > >>> > > >> --> > > >> Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)> > > >> _________________________________________________________________> > > >> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs> > > >> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com> > > >> > > > I forgot to mention that if I set the attribute> > Framed-Address to 0.0.0.0> > > the> > > >NS Plus assign the address from the pool and if I set to> > some fixed address> > > of> > > >my network it also works but in both cases there are no> > account records> > > >generated and worst, when I tried connect in an old NS> > they do not accept> > > >0.0.0.0 in the Framed-Address attribute and thus drop the line.> > > >> > > >> > > > Einstein Oliveira> >
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 5 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: This is so coolFrom: Pietro Bisignano <bisignano@imd.it>Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 03:17:48 +0200
At 19.00 14/06/98 -0600, you wrote:>Has anyone used this and if so, what did you think of it?>
I use it and could tell that it works very well, besides functioningin "state-less" mode also if, for any reason, the connection must godown, you suffice connect again to find again all like you had beenleft. In other words... Great!