Message 2: Re: licence problem solved
from "Mohammed Ersan" <ersan@first.net.jo>
Message 3: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
from timdp@tdpnet.com (Tim Pitman)
Message 4: Help RadiusNT and ACC Tigris Access Servers
from William Salame <williams@kbd.com.au>
Message 5: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
from Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
Message 6: RE: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
from "Chris Thomas" <christ@mbcom.com.au>
Message 7: Converting Access db from 1.16.60 to 2.5
from "Michael G. Minnich" <mminnich@logan.net>
Message 8: Re: Help RadiusNT and ACC Tigris Access Servers
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 9: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 10: Re: licence problem solved
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Message 11: Re: Converting Access db from 1.16.60 to 2.5
from "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 1 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
From: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 11:01:29 -0300
Dale E. Reed Jr. wrote:
>
> Einstein Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't think that this is a problem with RadiusNT but maybe this happened with
> > someone in this list.
> >
> > Actually we have a few USR NetServer 16 V.34 working with Radius 2.2.41 and
> > everything is fine with IP's being automatically assigned by the NetServer.
> >
> > Now we're trying to put a USR NetServer Plus V.34 to work with these guys but
> > there are some problems that I can't figure out why they are happening.
> >
> > When I connect through NetServer Plus the call is authenticated only if the
> > Framed-Addres attribute is set in the RadConfigs to the account; If not (wich
> > has been working perfectly with old NetServers) the connection is dropped and in
> > both cases no account records are generated in the calls table.
>
> Could it be that you don't have an address pool configured on the NS Plus?
>
> --
> Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
> _________________________________________________________________
> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
I forgot to mention that if I set the attribute Framed-Address to 0.0.0.0 the
NS Plus assign the address from the pool and if I set to some fixed address of
my network it also works but in both cases there are no account records
generated and worst, when I tried connect in an old NS they do not accept
0.0.0.0 in the Framed-Address attribute and thus drop the line.
Einstein Oliveira
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 2 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: licence problem solved
From: "Mohammed Ersan" <ersan@first.net.jo>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 16:23:34 +0300
Dale,
We have a liscense for 1000 MBRs and in my database there are the "liscenses" table only so whats the diff. between liscenses and licenses
At 08:28 PM 06/09/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Mourad Dahoumane wrote:
>>
>> Ok , I found where is the problem : there are two tables liscences and
>> licences.
>> in emerald admin, it seems to add the key to liscenses; I added it manually
>> through SE in licence table
>> now Radius start with "enterprise features enabled"
>
>Radius Checks first for the licenses table, then for the liscenses table.
>If you just drop your licenses table it will work as well.
>
>Emerald 2.5 will only use the licenses table as well.
>\
>
>--
>Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
>_________________________________________________________________
> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
>
<center>Mohammed Ersan
ersan@first.net.jo
firstnet
</center>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 3 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
From: timdp@tdpnet.com (Tim Pitman)
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 10:25:31 -0500
The old and new netserver will accept 255.255.255.254 to assign an IP
address from the pool.
-----Original Message-----
From: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
To: radiusnt@iea-software.com <radiusnt@iea-software.com>
Date: Saturday, June 13, 1998 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
>Dale E. Reed Jr. wrote:
>>
>> Einstein Oliveira wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I don't think that this is a problem with RadiusNT but maybe
this happened with
>> > someone in this list.
>> >
>> > Actually we have a few USR NetServer 16 V.34 working with
Radius 2.2.41 and
>> > everything is fine with IP's being automatically assigned by the
NetServer.
>> >
>> > Now we're trying to put a USR NetServer Plus V.34 to work with
these guys but
>> > there are some problems that I can't figure out why they are happening.
>> >
>> > When I connect through NetServer Plus the call is authenticated
only if the
>> > Framed-Addres attribute is set in the RadConfigs to the account; If not
(wich
>> > has been working perfectly with old NetServers) the connection is
dropped and in
>> > both cases no account records are generated in the calls table.
>>
>> Could it be that you don't have an address pool configured on the NS
Plus?
>>
>> --
>> Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
>> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
>
> I forgot to mention that if I set the attribute Framed-Address to 0.0.0.0
the
>NS Plus assign the address from the pool and if I set to some fixed address
of
>my network it also works but in both cases there are no account records
>generated and worst, when I tried connect in an old NS they do not accept
>0.0.0.0 in the Framed-Address attribute and thus drop the line.
>
>
> Einstein Oliveira
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 4 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Help RadiusNT and ACC Tigris Access Servers
From: William Salame <williams@kbd.com.au>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 01:30:20 +1000
Hi,
We are running Radius NT 2.2 along with emerald 2.1.11,
We Had Ascend MAX 4060 and Portmasters Livingstones, unfortunately the
Ascend
boxes blew ups
and we had to replace them over the weekend.
We replaced them with ACC Tigris Access Servers, and we have some
problems
with it. It is Authenticating
but doesn't send the accounting Information to the SQL database.
The Livingston are working fine without any errors.
At first we had a problem with the Acct-Session-Id We had to increase
It's size
from 10 Bytes to 20 Bytes, Now that is solved.
We have a different problem now, It doesn't seem to send the NAS Port
or the
Username to the database
There's a copy of the Radius Log
If any one running radiusNT with ACC Tigris
radrecv: Request from host cb1b5cfb code=4, id=186, length=195
User-Name = "terry"
NAS-Port = 27
NAS-Port-Type = Async
User-Service = Framed-User
Framed-Protocol = PPP
NAS-Port-DNIS = "92890100"
Caller-Id = "92890100"
NAS-Identifier = "203.27.92.251"
Acct-Status-Type = Start
Acct-Delay-Time = 3
Acct-Session-Id = "960827.005947.000487"
Acct-Authentic = RADIUS
Vendor-Specific = ""
Vendor-Specific = ""
Vendor-Specific = ""
Framed-Address = 255.255.255.254
Idle-Timeout = 1800
SQL Statement: INSERT INTO Calls
(CallDate,UserName,NASPort,NASPortType,UserService,Fra
medProtocol,NASPortDNIS,NASIdentifier,AcctStatusType,AcctDelayTime,AcctSessionId,FramedA
ddress) VALUES
(GetDate(),'terry',27,0,2,1,'92890100','203.27.92.251',1,3,'960827.005947
..000487','255.255.255.254')
Sending Accounting Ack of id 186 to cb1b5cfb (203.27.92.251)
Resp Time: 961 Auth: 173/35 -> 208 Acct: 70/45/10 -> 125
radrecv: Request from host cb1b5cfb code=4, id=187, length=69
NAS-Identifier = "203.27.92.251"
Acct-Status-Type = 7
Acct-Delay-Time = 35053
Acct-Session-Id = "960826.151536.000000"
SQL Statement: INSERT INTO Calls
(CallDate,NASIdentifier,AcctStatusType,AcctDelayTime,A
cctSessionId, UserName) VALUES
(GetDate(),'203.27.92.251',7,35053,'960826.151536.000000'
,'NULL')
ODBC: SQLExecDirect Error 233:
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The column NASPort in
table
Calls may no
t be null.
Resp Time: 241 Auth: 173/35 -> 208 Acct: 70/46/10 -> 126
radrecv: Request from host cb1b5cfb code=4, id=188, length=69
NAS-Identifier = "203.27.92.251"
Acct-Status-Type = 7
Acct-Delay-Time = 35056
Acct-Session-Id = "960826.151536.000000"
SQL Statement: INSERT INTO Calls
(CallDate,NASIdentifier,AcctStatusType,AcctDelayTime,A
cctSessionId, UserName) VALUES
(GetDate(),'203.27.92.251',7,35056,'960826.151536.000000'
,'NULL')
ODBC: SQLExecDirect Error 233:
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The column NASPort in
table
Calls may no
t be null.
Resp Time: 230 Auth: 173/35 -> 208 Acct: 70/47/10 -> 127
radrecv: Request from host cb1b5cfb code=4, id=189, length=69
NAS-Identifier = "203.27.92.251"
Acct-Status-Type = 7
Acct-Delay-Time = 35059
Acct-Session-Id = "960826.151536.000000"
SQL Statement: INSERT INTO Calls
(CallDate,NASIdentifier,AcctStatusType,AcctDelayTime,A
cctSessionId, UserName) VALUES
(GetDate(),'203.27.92.251',7,35059,'960826.151536.000000'
,'NULL')
ODBC: SQLExecDirect Error 233:
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The column NASPort in
table
Calls may no
t be null.
Resp Time: 230 Auth: 173/35 -> 208 Acct: 70/48/10 -> 128
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 5 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
From: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:02:52 -0300
Tim Pitman wrote:
>
> The old and new netserver will accept 255.255.255.254 to assign an IP
> address from the pool.
This solved the connection problem but I still have problems with accounting.
Here is a syslog message from NS Plus:
Jun 13 20:03:45 nsplus At 20:02:07, Facility "User Manager", Level "CRITICAL"::
AUTH: No acknowledgement from RADIUS accounting servers, reached max number of
timeouts
I'm using the same RadiusNT Server for Authentication and Accounting.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
> To: radiusnt@iea-software.com <radiusnt@iea-software.com>
> Date: Saturday, June 13, 1998 9:07 AM
> Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
>
> >Dale E. Reed Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >> Einstein Oliveira wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I don't think that this is a problem with RadiusNT but maybe
> this happened with
> >> > someone in this list.
> >> >
> >> > Actually we have a few USR NetServer 16 V.34 working with
> Radius 2.2.41 and
> >> > everything is fine with IP's being automatically assigned by the
> NetServer.
> >> >
> >> > Now we're trying to put a USR NetServer Plus V.34 to work with
> these guys but
> >> > there are some problems that I can't figure out why they are happening.
> >> >
> >> > When I connect through NetServer Plus the call is authenticated
> only if the
> >> > Framed-Addres attribute is set in the RadConfigs to the account; If not
> (wich
> >> > has been working perfectly with old NetServers) the connection is
> dropped and in
> >> > both cases no account records are generated in the calls table.
> >>
> >> Could it be that you don't have an address pool configured on the NS
> Plus?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> >> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
> >
> > I forgot to mention that if I set the attribute Framed-Address to 0.0.0.0
> the
> >NS Plus assign the address from the pool and if I set to some fixed address
> of
> >my network it also works but in both cases there are no account records
> >generated and worst, when I tried connect in an old NS they do not accept
> >0.0.0.0 in the Framed-Address attribute and thus drop the line.
> >
> >
> > Einstein Oliveira
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 6 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: RE: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
From: "Chris Thomas" <christ@mbcom.com.au>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 11:39:04 +0800
Have you checked the output from running RadiusNT in debug mode. We found
that the Netserver Plus was sending a larger than normal session ID, and as
a result, the field wasn't large enough and the record was rejected.
Checkout the debug errors and see if this is your problem.
Chris Thomas
Westnet Internet Services
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Einstein Oliveira [mailto:einstein@yawl.com.br]
> Sent: Sunday, 14 June 1998 10:03
> To: radiusnt@iea-software.com
> Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
>
>
> Tim Pitman wrote:
> >
> > The old and new netserver will accept 255.255.255.254 to
> assign an IP
> > address from the pool.
>
> This solved the connection problem but I still have problems
> with accounting.
> Here is a syslog message from NS Plus:
>
> Jun 13 20:03:45 nsplus At 20:02:07, Facility "User Manager",
> Level "CRITICAL"::
> AUTH: No acknowledgement from RADIUS accounting servers,
> reached max number of
> timeouts
>
>
> I'm using the same RadiusNT Server for Authentication and Accounting.
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
> > To: radiusnt@iea-software.com <radiusnt@iea-software.com>
> > Date: Saturday, June 13, 1998 9:07 AM
> > Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer Plus
> >
> > >Dale E. Reed Jr. wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Einstein Oliveira wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I don't think that this is a problem with
> RadiusNT but maybe
> > this happened with
> > >> > someone in this list.
> > >> >
> > >> > Actually we have a few USR NetServer 16 V.34
> working with
> > Radius 2.2.41 and
> > >> > everything is fine with IP's being automatically
> assigned by the
> > NetServer.
> > >> >
> > >> > Now we're trying to put a USR NetServer Plus
> V.34 to work with
> > these guys but
> > >> > there are some problems that I can't figure out why
> they are happening.
> > >> >
> > >> > When I connect through NetServer Plus the call
> is authenticated
> > only if the
> > >> > Framed-Addres attribute is set in the RadConfigs to
> the account; If not
> > (wich
> > >> > has been working perfectly with old NetServers) the
> connection is
> > dropped and in
> > >> > both cases no account records are generated in the calls table.
> > >>
> > >> Could it be that you don't have an address pool
> configured on the NS
> > Plus?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)
> > >> _________________________________________________________________
> > >> IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs
> > >> Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
> > >
> > > I forgot to mention that if I set the attribute
> Framed-Address to 0.0.0.0
> > the
> > >NS Plus assign the address from the pool and if I set to
> some fixed address
> > of
> > >my network it also works but in both cases there are no
> account records
> > >generated and worst, when I tried connect in an old NS
> they do not accept
> > >0.0.0.0 in the Framed-Address attribute and thus drop the line.
> > >
> > >
> > > Einstein Oliveira
>
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 7 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Converting Access db from 1.16.60 to 2.5
From: "Michael G. Minnich" <mminnich@logan.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 02:19:37 -0400
I have installed RadiusNT 2.5 on a new server and want to convert our
existing 1.16.60 Radius7.mdb (Access 97) to 2.5 Radius97.mdb schema. Where
can I find detailed instructions? I found in the archives how to convert
from 2.2 to 2.5, but not 1.xx to 2.5. Am I going to have to do it in two
steps...1. to 2.2 to 2.5?
TIA,
*********
Michael G. Minnich, President Access Visions Corporation
Voice: 937.593.7177 x.126 Fax: 937.592.4165
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.
| Message 8 |
'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'
Subject: Re: Help RadiusNT and ACC Tigris Access Servers
From: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:16:14 -0700
William Salame wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are running Radius NT 2.2 along with emerald 2.1.11,
> We Had Ascend MAX 4060 and Portmasters Livingstones, unfortunately the
> Ascend
> boxes blew ups
> and we had to replace them over the weekend.
> We replaced them with ACC Tigris Access Servers, and we have some
> problems
> with it. It is Authenticating
> but doesn't send the accounting Information to the SQL database.
> The Livingston are working fine without any errors.
> At first we had a problem with the Acct-Session-Id We had to increase
> It's size
>
> from 10 Bytes to 20 Bytes, Now that is solved.
> We have a different problem now, It doesn't seem to send the NAS Port
> or the
> Username to the database
>
> There's a copy of the Radius Log
> If any one running radiusNT with ACC Tigris
>
> radrecv: Request from host cb1b5cfb code=4, id=187, length=69
> NAS-Identifier = "203.27.92.251"
> Acct-Status-Type = 7
> Acct-Delay-Time = 35053
> Acct-Session-Id = "960826.151536.000000"
>
> SQL Statement: INSERT INTO Calls
> (CallDate,NASIdentifier,AcctStatusType,AcctDelayTime,A
> cctSessionId, UserName) VALUES
> (GetDate(),'203.27.92.251',7,35053,'960826.151536.000000'
> ,'NULL')
>
> ODBC: SQLExecDirect Error 233:
> [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The column NASPort in
> table
> Calls may no
> t be null.
>
> Resp Time: 241 Auth: 173/35 -> 208 Acct: 70/46/10 -> 126
What you are seeing is an Accounting-ON request. You should
upgrade to RadiusNT 2.5, as it handles these correctly.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 9 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: USR NetServer x USR NetServer PlusFrom: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:20:20 -0700
Einstein Oliveira wrote:> > I forgot to mention that if I set the attribute Framed-Address to 0.0.0.0 the> NS Plus assign the address from the pool and if I set to some fixed address of> my network it also works but in both cases there are no account records> generated and worst, when I tried connect in an old NS they do not accept> 0.0.0.0 in the Framed-Address attribute and thus drop the line.
You should be using 255.255.255.254 NOT 0.0.0.0.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 10 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: licence problem solvedFrom: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:22:43 -0700
Mohammed Ersan wrote:> > We have a liscense for 1000 MBRs and in my database there are the > "liscenses" table only so whats the diff. between liscenses and licenses
An s? :) I am not sure what you are asking.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com
..------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.| Message 11 |'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'Subject: Re: Converting Access db from 1.16.60 to 2.5From: "Dale E. Reed Jr." <daler@iea-software.com>Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:38:26 -0700
Michael G. Minnich wrote:> > I have installed RadiusNT 2.5 on a new server and want to convert our> existing 1.16.60 Radius7.mdb (Access 97) to 2.5 Radius97.mdb schema. Where> can I find detailed instructions? I found in the archives how to convert> from 2.2 to 2.5, but not 1.xx to 2.5. Am I going to have to do it in two> steps...1. to 2.2 to 2.5?
To be honest, 1.16 is really old, and I wouldn't know the full extentof its database support. The best way to do it would be to takethe 2.5 schema and just compare table by table.
-- Dale E. Reed Jr. (daler@iea-software.com)_________________________________________________________________ IEA Software, Inc. | RadiusNT, Emerald, and NT FAQs Internet Solutions for Today | http://www.iea-software.com